Table 4. Overall gender and STEM effects collapsed across year.
Item | Gender | STEM | Gender x STEM |
---|---|---|---|
Overall stress | Women > Men** | NS | NS |
General Climate | |||
Good climate for women | Women < Men*** | NS | NS |
Difficulty retaining women | NS | STEM > NonSTEM*** | NS |
Serious about treating men and women equally | Women < Men*** | NS | NS |
Women must work harder to be seen as competent | Women > Men*** | NS | NS |
Women faculty with young children considered less committed | Women > Men*** | NS | NS |
Men faculty with young children considered less committed | NS | NS | NS |
Student Behavior | |||
Treat women faculty differently than men | Women > Men*** | NS | STEM*** |
NonSTEM: NS | |||
Respect women faculty less than men | Women > Men*** | NS | STEM*** |
NonSTEM: NS | |||
Leadership/Influence | |||
Most faculty as comfortable with woman department chair as man | Women < Men*** | NS | NS |
Women less likely to have department influence | Women > Men*** | NS | NS |
Effort made to promote women to leadership position | Women < Men** | STEM < NonSTEM*** | NS |
Men more likely to be involved in informal networks | Women > Men*** | NS | NS |
Tenure/Promotion | |||
Tenure decision criteria applied the same way to women and men | Women < Men*** | NS | STEM*** |
NonSTEM: NS | |||
Promotion decision criteria applied the same way to women and men | Women < Men*** | NS | NS |
Only items significant at the relevant Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level are indicated.
*p < .05.
**p < .01.
***p < .001.