Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0301511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301511

Dietary patterns; serum concentrations of selenium, copper, and zinc; copper/zinc ratio; and total antioxidant status in patients with glaucoma

Izabela Zawadzka 1, Maryla Młynarczyk 1, Martyna Falkowska 2, Katarzyna Socha 2, Joanna Konopińska 1,*
Editor: Yung-Hsiang Chen3
PMCID: PMC10986966  PMID: 38564509

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the biochemical parameters that determine the occurrence of glaucoma and assess the correlation between oxidative stress and clinical data in patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. We enrolled 169 participants; the glaucoma group comprised 104 patients with primary open-angle, pseudoexfoliation, or angle-closure glaucoma, and the control group comprised 65 healthy individuals. Serum concentrations of selenium (Se), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn); Cu/Zn ratio; and total antioxidant status were measured in both groups. Significantly lower Se and Zn serum levels were observed in men (67.7 ± 17.14 g/L and 0.76 ± 0.11 mg/L, respectively) and women (68.73 ± 16.21 g/L and 0.76 ± 0.13, respectively) with glaucoma. Moreover, significant correlations were identified between serum Se concentration and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and between serum Cu concentration and CDVA (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively). We also observed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.244, p < 0.05) between pRNFL thickness and BMI and a negative correlation (r = -0.289, p < 0.05) between serum Se concentration and the age of male patients with glaucoma. Additionally, the percentages of participants with below-normal, normal, and above-normal Se, Zn, and total antioxidant capacity serum levels were compared between both groups. Compared with healthy controls, a significantly higher percentage of patients with glaucoma had a below-normal Se serum concentration. A notable negative correlation was observed between Zn and copper serum levels of patients with glaucoma in both sexes. We believe that this study serves as a basis for considering personalized nutritional therapy for the prevention and supportive treatment of patients with glaucoma.

Introduction

Glaucoma is characterized by progressive optic nerve degeneration which has multiple contributing factors. This pathology results in a gradual loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and associated axons, leading to distinct changes in the optic disc and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ultimately causing vision loss. Glaucoma affects approximately 3.54% (2.09–5.82%) of people aged 40–80 years [13], with projections of 111.8 million cases by 2040. Despite advanced therapeutic methods, such as pharmacology, lasers, and surgery, glaucoma remains globally the first leading cause of irreversible blindness. The only modifiable risk factor for glaucoma is elevated intraocular pressure (IOP); nonetheless, glaucoma can develop in individuals with normal IOP. Moreover, glaucomatous optic neuropathy in some patients progresses despite administering IOP-lowering drugs or surgery. This might indicate the presence of undefined molecular mechanisms underlying glaucoma development. The pathogenesis of glaucoma is associated with oxidative stress (OS), resulting from an imbalance between the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the capacity of antioxidant and antioxidant-repairing systems. Deficiency or over supplementation of some macro- and microelements also adversely affects the course of glaucomatous optic neuropathy [3]. Given the multifactorial etiology of glaucoma and its chronic nature, an appropriate diet and adjustment of the dietary intake of selected nutrients should be considered as adjuncts to treatment that may inhibit the disease progression. Antioxidants, including enzymatic cofactors, such as Se, Cu, and Zn, serve as antioxidant defense markers. Moreover, metal ions, such as Fe and Zn, are vital for normal cellular function, particularly in nervous system synapses. Fe and Zn are the key cofactors in neurotransmitter synthesis [4, 5]. Zn modulates synaptic activity and serves as an intracellular transmitter. Additionally, free forms of metals and metal ions are transduced by metalloproteins that influence specific intracellular functions. The involvement of these ions in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease, is of growing interest as a potential target for novel therapies [6]. The concentrations of metal ions in the retina, aqueous humor, and blood serum have been analyzed in glaucoma and other neurodegenerative diseases in laboratory animals and humans. In the retinas of mice with glaucoma, the Fe+ concentration is decreased, whereas that of Zn is twice as high as that in healthy animals. An elevated blood concentration of Fe in humans is associated with an increased glaucoma risk [7, 8]. Another study assessed Se, Cu, and Zn levels, as well as Cu/Zn and Cu/Se ratios, in patients with acute ischemic stroke and healthy controls [9] and found that patients with acute ischemic stroke presented with markedly lowered Se and Zn levels and elevated Cu/Zn and Cu/Se ratios. Such alterations in trace element content may cause inflammation and OS, eventually leading to stroke [9]. In a different study [5], lower serum concentrations of Zn and higher Cu/Zn ratios in patients with multiple sclerosis implied an association with OS. Hence, dietary supplementation with Zn may benefit patients with multiple sclerosis [10]. We speculate that a similar mechanism may be involved in the pathogenesis of glaucoma, another neurodegenerative disease. Evidence suggests that OS is crucial in the pathogenesis of glaucoma [5]. Therefore, identifying the disruptions of pro-oxidants in the antioxidant balance specific to the various types of glaucoma is crucial. This study aimed to identify biochemical parameters that determine an increased risk of glaucoma occurrence. Moreover, the correlations between OS and the clinical data of patients with glaucoma and those of healthy controls were analyzed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate trace mineral status in patients with glaucoma in a Polish population.

Materials and methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study data were gathered following approval from the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Bialystok (approval number: APK.002.174.2022), per the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and in compliance with good medical practice. All participants provided written informed consent for the use of their blood test results, nutritional survey data, and examination findings in scientific research publications. The recruitment period began on February 24, 2022, and ended on December 12, 2022.

We enrolled 169 participants; the glaucoma group consisted of 104 patients with glaucoma, and the healthy control group included 65 individuals. Patients with glaucoma were recruited from the Ophthalmology Clinic of the Medical University of Bialystok, a tertiary center for patients with glaucoma from the Podlaskie Voivodeship. Control group was recruited from patient’s family members attending them for the control visit as well as clinical personnel. All individuals underwent ophthalmological examinations, which included a slit-lamp examination, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) assessment, IOP measurement using a Goldman applanation tonometer or a portable Tonopen device (in the case of patients with disabilities), and fundoscopy. The anterior eye segment and iridocorneal angle were examined in detail to accurately identify the glaucoma type (primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG], pseudoexfoliation glaucoma [PEXG], or primary angle-closure glaucoma [PACG]) in each patient. The severity of glaucoma was determined by optic nerve disc evaluation, the presence of optic disc cupping, focal damage, and the 30–2° Humphrey VF test (Carl Zeiss Meditec Dublin, CA), according to Hodapp’s classification. Optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Engineering) was performed to measure the peripapillary RNFL (pRNFL).

The control group consisted of 65 individuals without any ophthalmic disease, comprising cataract. The exclusion criteria for the study included a history of severe systemic illnesses, such as liver and intestinal diseases resulting in malabsorption syndrome, hypothyroidism, hypovitaminosis, psychiatric disorders, autoimmune diseases, or neoplasms. Individuals with a history of alcohol abuse syndrome, prior ophthalmological surgery, ocular inflammation, retinal vascular diseases, or diabetic retinopathy were excluded from the study. Additionally, individuals taking dietary vitamin supplements, especially those containing Se, Zn, or Cu, or medications that could potentially affect the trace element levels were excluded from the study.

Data collection, sample preparation, and biochemical analysis

Dietary data were collected using a food frequency questionnaire developed by the Committee of Human Nutrition Science of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Patients diagnosed with glaucoma were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the frequency of their consumption of various food products. Completion of these questionnaires was overseen by a currently attending primary physician in the ophthalmology department. The questionnaire included 34 distinct groups of food items: white bread, wholegrain bread, sweet bread, rice, oatmeal, groats, milk, white cheese, poultry, offal, sausages, ham, bacon, lard, meat, tinned meat, fish, eggs, butter, margarine, oils, potatoes, raw vegetables, fruit, sugar, honey, marmalade, sweet drinks, legumes, beer, wine, vodka, coffee, and tea. For this study, consumption was frequent if specific food products were consumed twice to thrice weekly or more, except for fish and fish products, for which consumption once or more weekly was considered frequent. Consumption was considered seldom if food items were consumed not more than once weekly. This categorization aligns with the recommendations of the Committee on Human Nutrition Science of the Polish Academy of Sciences for assessing the frequency of consuming specific food products.

Blood samples (approximately 6 mL) were collected from the study participants using vacutainer test tubes containing a clot activator recommended for elemental analysis (Becton Dickinson, France). These collected samples were centrifuged for 10 min at approximately 1000 × g. Subsequently, sera were obtained and preserved by freezing at −20°C. Deproteination was performed using 1 mol/L spectral-grade nitric acid (Merck, Germany) to prepare the serum samples for analysis. Additionally, 1% Triton X-100 was introduced into the samples and vortexed, and another round of centrifugation was performed, lasting 10 min. The Zn concentration was quantified in the resulting supernatant, whereas Cu content was determined after suitable dilution in 0.1 mol/L nitric acid. Se concentrations were determined directly after a 1:1 dilution with 0.2% Triton X-100.

To analyze the influence of the frequency of consuming different food groups on the concentration of a selected element, we used the stepwise forward multiple regression method.

Measurement of mineral components and total antioxidant status

The serum concentrations of Se, Cu, and Zn were assessed using atomic absorption spectrometry techniques, specifically electrothermal for Se and Cu and flame for Zn, with Zeeman background correction. These measurements were carried out at wavelengths of 196 nm for Se, 324.8 nm for Cu, and 213.9 nm for Zn, utilizing the Z-2000 instrument (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Calibration curves were constructed using working solutions derived from 1 g/L standard solutions obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The limits of detection for Se, Cu, and Zn were 1.84 μg/L, 0.51 μg/L, and 0.011 mg/L, respectively. A certified matrix reference material in the form of human serum (Seronorm Trace Elements, Serum Level 1, 0903106; Sero AS, Billingstad, Norway) was employed to ensure the accuracy and precision of the analytical methods. The results obtained for the control samples were aligned with the established reference values. The analytical methods for Se, Cu, and Zn had precision values of 3.3%, 2.3%, and 1.8%, respectively.

The Department of Bromatology at the Medical University of Bialystok actively participated in a quality control program for trace element analysis under the supervision of the National Institute of Public Health, the National Institute of Hygiene, and the Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Physics, all in Warsaw, Poland. The serum concentrations of Se, Cu, and Zn in the glaucoma group were subsequently evaluated in comparison to the reference values of healthy controls (66–104 μg/L, 0.7–1.6 mg/L, and 0.7–1.3 mg/L, respectively) [11]. The Cu/Zn molar ratio was calculated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA).

The total antioxidant status (TAS) of the serum was determined spectrophotometrically at 600 nm. The analysis was conducted using commercially available test kits provided by Randox Laboratories Ltd. (Crumlin, UK) and a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Cintra 3030; GBC, Melbourne, Australia). The assay involved incubating ABTS® (2,20-Azino-di-[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulphonate]) with peroxidase (metmyoglobin) and H2O2 to generate the radical cation ABTS®*+. This radical exhibited a relatively stable blue-green color, which was measured at 600 nm. The antioxidants in the tested samples caused a reduction in color production—proportional to their concentration. The accuracy of this method was validated using a TAS Control kit from Randox Laboratories, Ltd. The reference range for TAS in the serum was 1.3–1.77 mmol/L [12].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistica software (version 13.0; TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Variations between independent groups were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U or ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis test, depending on the number of groups involved. Group comparisons were performed using Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Correlations were determined using Spearman’s rank test. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was employed to assess the impact of dietary habits on Se, Cu, and Zn levels and TAS in the study participants. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (S2 File).

Results

Demographic characteristics of the study population

The analysis was based on patients with glaucoma (n = 104) and control participants (n = 65). The percentages of men were 32.7% and 23.1%, whereas those of women were 67.3% and 76.9%, respectively, with no significant differences between the study groups. The mean age in the glaucoma group was 70.4 ± 10.6 years, and that in the control group was 62.9 ± 11.8 years. No significant difference in age existed between the groups. Body mass index (BMI) was available only for patients with glaucoma, which was 28.46 ± 4.42 kg/m2 (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study groups.

Variable Glaucoma group Control group
n (%) or mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) n (%) or mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3)
N 104 (100.0) - 65 (100.0) -
Sex, male 34 (32.4) - 15 (23.1) -
Sex, female 70 (67.3) - 50 (76.9) -
Age, years 70.4 ± 10.6 73 (66; 77) 62.9 ± 11.8 64 (55; 70)
BMI, kg/m 2 28.46 ± 4.42 27.73 (25.39; 31.04) - -

Notes: BMI, body mass index; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation

Se, Cu, Zn, and TAS levels and Cu/Zn ratio

In our study, significant differences were observed in the serum levels of Se, Zn, and the Cu/Zn ratio between the glaucoma and control groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively). The serum Se concentration was significantly lower in patients with glaucoma (68.40 ± 16.44 μg/L) than in healthy individuals (86.02 ± 50.04 μg/L). In addition, Zn levels were significantly lower in the glaucoma group (0.76 ± 0.12 mg/L) than in the control group (0.85 ± 0.16 mg/L). Another significantly different parameter was the Cu/Zn ratio, which differed between the glaucoma and control groups (1.51 ± 0.52 and 1.35 ± 0.57, respectively). The Cu and TAS levels did not significantly differ between groups (Table 2); however, we observed a negative correlation (r = -0.396, p < 0.05) between these parameters.

Table 2. Comparison of Se, Zn, Cu, and TAS concentrations and Cu/Zn ratio between the study groups.

Variable Glaucoma group Control group p-value
Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3)
Se, μg/L 68.40 ± 16.44 66.57 (57.90; 77.23) 86.02 ± 50.04 75.48 (69.07; 86.87) < 0.001*
Zn, mg/L 0.76 ± 0.12 0.76 (0.68; 0.82) 0.85 ± 0.16 0.82 (0.75; 0.94) < 0.001*
Cu, mg/L 1.10 ± 0.34 1.09 (0.89; 1.29) 1.08 ± 0.37 0.99 (0.85; 1.24) 0.261
Cu/Zn, molar ratio 1.51 ± 0.52 1.47 (1.14; 1.81) 1.35 ± 0.57 1.29 (0.98; 1.45) 0.008*
TAS, mmol/L 1.51 ± 0.28 1.55 (1.41; 1.65) 1.50 ± 0.58 1.50 (1.07; 1.79) 0.408

Notes: Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation; TAS, total antioxidant status

Correlations of micronutrients with pRNFL thickness, CDVA, IOP, and BMI

Next, we investigated the correlations between micronutrients and pRNFL thickness, CDVA, IOP, BMI, glaucoma type, and sex within the study population Significant correlations were identified between serum Se concentration and CDVA and between serum Cu concentration and CDVA (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively). We also observed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.244, p < 0.05) between pRNFL thickness and BMI and a negative correlation (r = -0.289, p < 0.05) between serum Se concentration and the age of male patients with glaucoma.

Additionally, we assessed the levels of serum trace elements among individuals diagnosed with glaucoma, distinguishing between smokers and non-smokers. We identified a significant reduction in serum Se concentrations among smoking patients with glaucoma (62.48 ± 18.14 μg/L) compared to non-smoking patients with glaucoma (71.93 ± 16.07 μg/L). However, we did not detect differences in the serum concentrations of other microelements between these two groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Serum Se, Zn, Cu, and TAS concentrations and Cu/Zn molar ratio in patients with glaucoma according to smoking status.

Variable Smokers (n = 25) Non-smokers (n = 75)
Se, μg/L Mean ± SD 62.48 ± 18.14 71.93 ± 16.07
Min–max 30.39–106.90 43.74–113.26
Median (Q1; Q3) 61.87 (57.27; 71.39) 70.25 (59.33; 83.11)
p-value < 0.001*
Zn, mg/L Mean ± SD 0.793 ± 0.113 0.761 ± 0.117
Min–max 0.541–1.024 0.476–1.061
Median (Q1; Q3) 0.739 (0.723; 0.851) 0.761 (0.679; 0.816)
p-value 0.151
Cu, mg/L Mean ± SD 1.096 ± 0.364 1.079 ± 0.346
Min–max 0.407–1.711 0.511–2.041
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.057 (0.947; 1.312) 1.073 (0.857; 1.306)
p-value 0.787
Cu/Zn, molar ratio Mean ± SD 1.42 ± 0.44 1.49 ± 0.52
Min–max 0.51–2.36 0.60–3.043
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.38 (1.11; 1.71) 1.46 (1.13; 1.78)
p-value 0.593
TAS, mmol/L Mean ± SD 1.52 ± 0.20 1.50 ± 0.26
Min–max 1.27–1.94 0.38–2.11
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.55 (1.41; 1.65) 1.53 (1.41; 1.64)
p-value 0.859

Notes: Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation; TAS, total antioxidant status

In the glaucoma group, sex-dependent variability in the serum concentrations of Se, Zn, and Cu and Cu/Zn ratios was also observed. Significantly lower serum levels of Se and Zn were observed in men (67.7 ± 17.14 μg/L and 0.76 ± 0.11 mg/L, respectively) and women (68.73 ± 16.21 μg/L and 0.76 ± 0.13 mg/L, respectively) diagnosed with glaucoma than in healthy men (78.64 ± 15.13 μg/L and 0.82 ± 0.21 mg/L, respectively) and women (88.23 ± 56.43 μg/L and 0.71 ± 0.14 mg/L, respectively). Moreover, decreased serum Cu concentrations were observed in men (1.07 ± 0.31 mg/L) and women (1.10 ± 0.35 mg/L) diagnosed with glaucoma compared to their counterparts in the control group (men: 1.14 ± 0.42 mg/L, women: 1.06 ± 0.36 mg/L; Table 4).

Table 4. Sex-dependent distribution of microelement concentrations and total antioxidant status.

Variable Patients with glaucoma Control group
Men (A) Women (B) Men (C) Women (D)
(n = 34) (n = 70) (n = 15) (n = 50)
Se, μg/L Mean ± SD 67.7 ± 17.14 68.73 ± 16.21 78.64 ± 15.13 88.23 ± 56.43
Min–max 35.05–104.92 30.39–113.26 50.88–106.8 48.63–388.67
Median (Q1; Q3) 63.80 (56.65; 75.39) 66.79 (58.98; 79.88) 77.89 (75.54; 89.13) 74.52 (68.24; 86.1)
p-value A vs. C: 0.02*, B vs. D: 0.004*
Zn, mg/L Mean ± SD 0.76 ± 0.11 0.76 ± 0.13 0.82 ± 0.21 0.71 ± 0.14
Min–max 0.56–1.10 0.48–1.06 0.68–1.50 0.55–1.12
Median (Q1; Q3) 0.76 (0.69; 0.81) 0.75 (0.67; 0.83) 0.90 (0.76; 1.04) 0.82 (0.74; 0.91)
p-value A vs. C: 0.006*, B vs. D: 0.003*
Cu, mg/L Mean ± SD 1.07 ± 0.31 1.10 ± 0.35 1.14 ± 0.42 1.06 ± 0.36
Min–max 0.52–1.75 0.41–2.04 0.70–2.36 0.53–2.31
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.09 (0.88; 1.26) 1.1 (0.90; 1.31) 0.99 (0.86; 1.37) 0.99 (0.81; 1.24)
p-value A vs. C: 0.005*, B vs. D: 0.004*
Cu/Zn, molar ratio Mean ± SD 1.46 ± 0.45 1.54 ± 0.55 1.35 ± 0.68 1.35 ± 0.54
Min–max 0.63–2.53 0.51–3.08 0.70–3.44 0.59–3.32
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.43 (1.01; 1.76) 1.47 (1.15; 1.83) 1.25 (0.96; 1.44) 1.29 (0.99; 1.47)
p-value A vs. C: ns, B vs. D: 0.024*
TAS, mmol/L Mean ± SD 1.57 ± 0.27 1.49 ± 0.28 1.50 ± 0.71 1.51 ± 0.55
Min–max 1.01–2.11 0.38–2.01 0.87–3.47 0.63–3.50
Median (Q1; Q3) 1.56 (1.43; 1.70) 1.52 (1.35; 1.65) 1.37 (1.01; 1.65) 1.53 (1.09; 1.79)
p-value A vs. C: ns, B vs. D: = ns

Notes: ns, not significant; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation; TAS, total antioxidant status

Significant differences in the proportions of participants with Se, Zn, and TAS levels in relation to the standard values were observed between the two study groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.02, and p < 0.001, respectively). The proportions of participants with standard Se levels were 46.2% and 75.4% in the glaucoma and control groups, respectively. A higher proportion of participants had Se levels below the standard in the glaucoma group than in the control group (50.0% vs. 15.4%). The number of participants with Se levels above the standard was lower in the glaucoma group (3.8%, n = 4 vs. 9.2%, n = 6). The proportion of participants with standard Zn levels was lower among patients with glaucoma (64.4%) than among control participants (80.0%). A higher proportion of participants had Zn levels below the standard in the glaucoma group than in the control group (35.6% vs. 18.5%). No patient had Zn levels above the standard level in the glaucoma group. However, the Zn level exceeded the standard in one participant of the control group. The proportion of participants with standard TAS levels was over two-fold higher in the glaucoma group than in the control group (69.2% vs. 30.4%). A lower proportion of participants had TAS levels below the standard in the glaucoma group than in the control group (18.3% vs. 48.2%). The number of participants with TAS levels above the standard was also lower in the glaucoma group (12.5%) than in the control group (21.4%). No significant difference was confirmed in participants with below-the-standard/standard/above-the-standard Cu levels (Table 5).

Table 5. Comparison of Se, Zn, Cu, and TAS levels between the study groups in relation to reference values.

Variable Glaucoma group Control group p-value
Se
 Low 52 (50.0) 10 (15.4) < 0.001
 Normal 48 (46.2) 49 (75.4)
 High 4 (3.8) 6 (9.2)
Zn
 Low 37 (35.6) 12 (18.5) 0.014 1
 Normal 67 (64.4) 52 (80.0)
 High 0 (0.0) 1 (1.5)
Cu
 Low 14 (13.4) 4 (6.2) 0.312
 Normal 84 (80.8) 56 (86.2)
 High 6 (5.8) 5 (7.7)
TAS
 Low 19 (18.3) 27 (48.2) < 0.001
 Normal 72 (69.2) 17 (30.4)
 High 13 (12.5) 12 (21.4)

Notes: Data were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test1. TAS, total antioxidant status

Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that 15 dietary habits determined 50% of the serum Se concentration. An increase in Se concentration was significantly associated with the frequent consumption of fish, meat, coffee, milk, and eggs. In contrast, the frequent consumption of beer, bacon, lard, white bread, and potatoes was associated with a decrease in Se levels. Serum Zn concentration was influenced by 15 dietary habits up to 42%, with positive effects associated with frequent consumption of ham, offal, potatoes, and milk, whereas vegetable oil and raw vegetables had a negative effect. According to the analysis, the consumption frequency of five selected food products explain 38% of the variation in Cu concentration in your study population. Bacon, lard, potatoes, grits, and rice had a negative effect; however, frequent consumption of fruits was associated with positive effects on serum Cu concentration. Moreover, serum TAS concentration was influenced by 12 dietary habits up to 13%, and frequent consumption of margarine significantly decreased serum TAS levels (S1 Table). We did not observe notable variations in the serum concentrations of these elements in patients with different types of glaucoma. The determined serum levels were not significantly different among patients with different types of glaucoma (Table 6).

Table 6. Comparison of Se, Zn, Cu, and TAS levels and Cu/Zn ratio between glaucoma types.

Variable POAG (n = 58) PEXG (n = 16) PACG (n = 17) Other types (n = 7) p
Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3)
Se, mg/L 66.44 ± 17.37 63.74 (55.42; 75.97) 76.40 ± 18.53 71.05 (63.23; 81.46) 72.73 ± 17.14 72.81 (59.88; 83.02) 67.63 ± 11.38 66.91 (59.78; 76.19) 0.175
Zn, mg/L 0.77 ± 0.14 0.76 (0.68; 0.85) 0.74 ± 0.09 0.77 (0.70; 0.81) 0.76 ± 0.09 0.76 (0.71; 0.82) 0.77 ± 0.11 0.75 (0.71; 0.82) 0.912
Cu, mg/L 1.05 ± 0.36 1.02 (0.83; 1.28) 1.22 ± 0.32 1.17 (1.05; 1.45) 1.03 ± 0.28 1.07 (0.92; 1.17) 1.17 ± 0.30 1.16 (0.99; 1.26) 0.281
Cu/Zn, molar ratio 1.45 ± 0.55 1.38 (1.02; 1.79) 1.72 ± 0.56 1.61 (1.38; 1.94) 1.42 ± 0.41 1.47 (1.20; 1.71) 1.56 ± 0.35 1.67 (1.28; 1.79) 0.263
TAS, mmol/L 1.53 ± 0.25 1.52 (1.40; 1.65) 1.53 ± 0.28 1.55 (1.42; 1.64) 1.49 ± 0.35 1.58 (1.43; 1.64) 1.51 ± 0.17 1.50 (1.45; 1.65) 0.9771

Notes: POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; PEXG, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma; PACG, primary angle-closure glaucoma; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation. Data were compared with ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test1.

In the glaucoma group, the effect of fish consumption as a source of selenium was statistically significant; patients who consumed fish more frequently had higher selenium levels compared to those who consumed fish less frequently (without considering other dietary factors), Table 7.

Table 7. Relationship between the frequency of fish consumption and the serum concentration of selenium in patients with glaucoma.

Fish consumption frequency Number of patients with glaucoma Concentration of selenium in serum (μg/L) p
Frequent (more than once a week) 51 74.92 ± 17.49 < 0.005*
Seldom (less or equal to once a week) 53 64.87 ± 13.40

Discussion

In our research, study participants with glaucoma had considerably lower Se and Zn serum levels along with a noticeably higher Cu/Zn ratio than healthy study participants. Additionally, our findings highlight the effects of dietary choices on the serum concentrations of these elements. These shifts in elemental concentrations are closely linked to disturbances in antioxidant enzyme function. Such disturbances can increase OS, which may be pivotal in glaucoma development.

The primary approach for treating glaucoma involves interventions for lowering IOP using a combination of topical medications, laser therapy, and surgical procedures. Nevertheless, in certain instances, the disease continues to advance despite successfully lowering the IOP. Consequently, potential non-IOP-related risk factors associated with glaucoma and the mechanisms underlying RGC degeneration have been explored. Previously identified risk factors include genetics, mitochondrial impairment, vascular dysregulation, and OS [13].

OS is characterized by an imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant defenses. ROS, including superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO•), are byproducts of the mitochondrial cellular metabolism of oxygen. Furthermore, ROS can originate from external sources, including exposure to light radiation, environmental contaminants, xenobiotics, ozone, cigarette smoke, and other factors. Low ROS levels regulate signaling pathways that influence normal physiological and biological reactions [14].

Excessive ROS production decreases adenosine triphosphate synthesis but increases the oxidation of proteins, lipids, and DNA. These mechanisms promote OS, ultimately leading to cell membrane damage, which triggers apoptosis. This process is particularly important in tissues of the central nervous and visual systems, which depend heavily on mitochondrial aerobic energy production. In healthy physiological states, a well-functioning antioxidant system that includes enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione effectively neutralizes ROS [15].

In the early stages of POAG, reduced blood flow and oxygen delivery to the optic nerve head owing to high IOP have been hypothesized to result in mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby increasing ROS production and promoting OS. These events can trigger inflammatory processes in the eye. This sequence of events and chronic inflammation may damage RGCs, subsequently causing progressive vision loss typically associated with glaucoma [15].

OS has three primary effects on glaucoma. First, it increases IOP by modifying the trabecular meshwork and obstructing the outflow of aqueous humor. Second, it interferes with the self-regulation of blood flow to the optic nerve by affecting the blood vessels. Finally, individuals with diminished antioxidative mechanisms in the eye are at a greater risk of experiencing systemic OS, previously documented as being capable of causing RGC death [13].

In the context of glaucoma development, trace element levels, such as Se, Zn, Cu, manganese, chromium, cobalt, and molybdenum, fluctuate. These elements are crucial in upholding the equilibrium between pro-oxidative and antioxidative processes owing to their antioxidative properties. They function as cofactors and are found in the prosthetic groups of numerous enzymes [7].

Selenium

Se, a crucial trace element, is a component of essential antioxidants. Its unique redox properties, associated with selenocysteine, are utilized by antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidases (GPx), thioredoxin reductases, and iodothyronine deiodinases. GPx is crucial in preserving membrane integrity by reducing the levels of ROS metabolites [16].

Several studies have established a relationship between Se levels and glaucoma development [17, 18]. However, no universally accepted Se level serves as a diagnostic or predictive marker for glaucoma. In a study by Bruhn et al., Se levels in the blood plasma and aqueous humor were compared between individuals with and without POAG. The research by these authors identified an association between a high plasma Se concentration and glaucoma [17]. In contrast to the study by Bruhn et al., male and female patients with glaucoma in our study had significantly lower serum Se levels compared to the control group. The factors contributing to these discrepancies could be racial differences. The patients in Bruhn et al. were predominantly of Hispanic ethnicity, comprising almost 80% of their study population. In contrast, our study consisted entirely of individuals of Caucasian ethnicity. The poorer dietary habits regarding selenium intake in our population compared to those of the Hispanic population in Bruhn et al. may have influenced the study results. Moreover, soils in Poland are considerably deficient in total selenium content. These might be factors contributing to the observed differences between those two studies. The serum Se concentration was determined based on the Se absorbed through daily dietary intake. The serum selenium concentration was influenced by 15 specific dietary habits, which collectively accounted for 50% of the variation. Regular fish, meat, coffee, milk, and egg consumption increased Se concentrations. In line with these findings, Kieliszek and Błażejak demonstrated that food products with high Se content include meat, fish, offal, and cereals [19].

Despite incorporating selenium-rich products into the diet of patients with glaucoma, their serum Se levels remained low. This could be attributed to the variability in Se content, which is influenced by factors such as soil conditions. As mentioned above, the soils in Poland are considerably deficient in total Se content, not exceeding 0.5 mg/kg s.m. For the Podlaskie Voivodeship where the study population resided, it is even only 0.06–0.4 mg/kg s.m. Furthermore, research has been conducted in Poland since the 1980s to determine the content of this element in biological samples (blood serum and urine), with tests being conducted approximately every 10 years. From 1981 to 1999, a two-fold decrease in serum Se concentration was observed in all age groups that underwent the tests. For instance, a decrease in blood serum Se concentration was observed in non-pregnant women, decreasing from 95 ± 13 μg/L in 1981 to 54 ± 12 μg/L in 1999. However, the standard range of Se concentration for adults is optimal for the activity of serum GPx, is 66–104 μg/L. We hypothesize that the previously observed decrease in Se bioavailability in our study area may have led to a consequent decrease in Se levels in the agricultural and animal products consumed by our study population.

Se absorption from foods is also influenced by dietary elements, such as fat, protein, and the presence of heavy metals [20]. Moreover, consuming beer, beverages, lard, white bread, and potatoes leads to decreased serum Se levels.

Numerous studies have described the serum levels of Se in smokers and non-smokers. Luty-Frackiewicz et al. [21] described the dietary habits of the population in Silesia and observed a decrease in Se levels in the serum of smokers compared to that of non-smokers; however, these authors did not observe a significant difference between these groups. Some reports described equal serum Se levels in smoking and non-smoking groups [16, 22], whereas other studies reported significant group differences [17, 23]. In our study, a significant difference in Se levels between smokers and non-smokers was observed. This can be explained based on the work of Luty-Frackiewicz et al., who suggested that smokers may require an increased intake of vitamins and nutrients by approximately 40%, which could influence the significant deficiencies in Se levels [21]. This in turn can be explained by the greater OS in smokers caused by increased exposure to toxic elements (such as Cd and Pb) due to smoking cigarettes. Selenium has a detoxifying effect when exposed to toxic elements and may be washed out faster in comparison to non-smokers.

Zinc

Zn, an essential micronutrient, is crucially involved in the active sites of approximately 300 enzymes and is integral to numerous signaling pathways. It is widely recognized for its antioxidant properties and its role in eliminating superoxide radicals [7].

In our study, we observed lower serum concentrations of Zn in female and male participants with glaucoma than in healthy controls. A decrease in the serum concentration of Zn can disrupt antioxidant defense mechanisms and its ability to maintain cellular integrity, resulting in increased OS, which is considered to contribute to glaucoma development. Akyol et al. examined Zn and Cu levels in the serum and aqueous humor of individuals with glaucoma and cataracts. The glaucoma group had the highest Cu concentration, and a notable negative correlation was observed between the Zn and Cu levels in the serum of patients with glaucoma. This suggests that elevated Cu and reduced Zn levels may be significant factors in patients with glaucoma [24].

According to our research findings, 15 nutritional factors collectively accounted for 42% of the variation in serum Zn concentration. Notably, the regular intake of ham, offal, and potatoes has been positively associated with higher serum Zn levels. Meat products are a good source of Zn because they contain complete proteins that can increase Zn bioavailability. Conversely, the consumption of vegetable oil and raw vegetables may be linked to a significant decrease in serum Zn concentration because plant products contain dietary fiber and phytates, which reduce Zn bioavailability.

Copper

Cu is typically acknowledged for its antioxidant functions in human metabolism and is essential in several critical processes, such as ROS detoxification, energy metabolism, Fe absorption, and cellular signaling. The biological role of Cu is intricately linked to its participation in the structures and activities of various enzymes, including Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, β-dopamine hydroxylase, cytochrome c, tyrosinase, ceruloplasmin, hephaestin, and lysyl oxidase. Cu Zn superoxide dismutase demonstrates antioxidant capabilities by effectively neutralizing superoxide radicals and is crucial in controlling apoptotic signaling and mitigating OS [7, 25].

In our study, the serum Cu concentration of patients with glaucoma did not vary significantly from that of the control group. However, the glaucoma group exhibited an elevated Cu/Zn ratio compared to the control group. A high Cu/Zn ratio has been observed in older adults, particularly in those with neurodegenerative disorders, including glaucoma. Furthermore, an elevated Cu/Zn ratio is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular-related mortality, malignancy, and all-cause mortality in older adults [26].

We observed a significant decrease in serum Cu levels in male and female patients with glaucoma compared to sex-matched healthy controls. Numerous reports have suggested a protective role of Cu as a metabolic antioxidant.

TAS

OS can be evaluated using various biomarkers, and multiple methods have been developed to measure total oxidative capacity by assessing each antioxidant component individually. TAS is a comprehensive measure aimed at describing the balance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants in the plasma. Studies have revealed reduced serum TAS levels in patients with glaucoma [27].

In the current study, we did not observe significant differences in serum TAS levels of patients with glaucoma compared to those of participants in the control group. Therefore, dietary habits may have limited direct effects on serum TAS levels. We included 12 dietary factors in the regression model, and only frequent consumption of margarine had a significant negative effect, leading to a decrease in serum TAS levels. Consuming saturated fat-rich foods, such as margarine, can contribute to the onset of metabolic complications. This includes an increased production of ROS, which results in increased OS [28].

Pathophysiological differences between POAG, PEXG, and PACG

Glaucoma is a disease of multifactorial etiology. Under physiological conditions, aqueous humor flows from the posterior to the anterior eye chamber and is then drained via outflow pathways including the trabecular meshwork, choroidal-scleral pathway, and the iris. In POAG, the outflow of the aqueous humor is hindered due to increased resistance at the level of these outflow tracts. One of the most common causes of secondary open-angle glaucoma is PEXG, associated with the deposition of protein-like material within the anterior segment of the eye, especially in the iridocorneal angle and lens capsule. In PACG, the peripheral part of the iris overlaps the trabecular meshwork, blocking the outflow of the aqueous humor. Although, we hypothesized possible effects of trace element concentrations on specific glaucoma types, our study revealed no significant differences.

Conclusions

The studied microelements may be pivotal in modulating the activity of critical antioxidant enzymes associated with glaucoma, influencing various processes, including programmed cell death, inflammatory responses, OS, and neuroprotection. Dietary pattern modification can influence the levels of serum elements, thus providing opportunities to prevent the occurrence of glaucoma in high-risk patients. We emphasize that examining serum levels of microelements can provide valuable insights into the biochemical profile of glaucomatous eye changes, offering new low-cost opportunities for early prevention and functional, supportive treatments. The results obtained in this project may help provide better advice on dietary adjustment, thereby supporting treatment and slowing glaucoma progression. We believe that this study serves as a basis for considering personalized nutritional therapy for the prevention and supportive treatment of patients with early-stage glaucoma. However, the aforementioned results should be further investigated in a significantly larger study population and tailored to region-specific dietary habits. Further studies are needed to identify the cutoff values of microelement concentrations that distinguish between various types of glaucoma and their potential as pharmacotherapy effectiveness markers.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Relationships between frequency of food product consumption and serum Se, Cu, Zn, and TAS levels according to multiple stepwise regression analysis.

(DOCX)

pone.0301511.s001.docx (15.3KB, docx)
S1 File. Certificate of English language editing.

(PDF)

pone.0301511.s002.pdf (272.3KB, pdf)
S2 File. Dataset used to statistical analysis.

(DOCX)

pone.0301511.s003.docx (255.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage for English language editing (S1 File).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Shpak AA, Guekht AB, Druzhkova TA, Troshina AA, Gulyaeva NV. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and age-related cataract. Mol Vis. 2022;28: 39–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kang JM, Tanna AP. Glaucoma. Med Clin North Am. 2021;105: 493–510. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121: 2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfanner N, Warscheid B, Wiedemann N. Mitochondrial proteins: From biogenesis to functional networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20: 267–284. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0092-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McAllister BB, Dyck RH. Zinc transporter 3 (ZnT3) and vesicular zinc in central nervous system function. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80: 329–350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Socha K, Klimiuk K, Naliwajko SK, Soroczyńska J, Puścion-Jakubik A, Markiewicz-Żukowska R, et al. Dietary habits, selenium, copper, zinc and total antioxidant status in serum in relation to cognitive functions of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients. 2021;13: 287. doi: 10.3390/nu13020287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamińska A, Romano GL, Rejdak R, Zweifel S, Fiedorowicz M, Rejdak M, et al. Influence of trace elements on neurodegenerative diseases of the eye-the glaucoma model. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22: 4323. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gye HJ, Kim JM, Yoo C, Shim SH, Won YS, Sung KC, et al. Relationship between high serum ferritin level and glaucoma in a South Korean population: the Kangbuk Samsung health study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100: 1703–1707. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mirończuk A, Kapica-Topczewska K, Socha K, Soroczyńska J, Jamiołkowski J, Kułakowska A, et al. Selenium, copper, zinc concentrations and Cu/Zn, Cu/Se molar ratios in the serum of patients with acute ischemic stroke in Northeastern Poland—A new insight into stroke pathophysiology. Nutrients. 2021;13: 2139. doi: 10.3390/nu13072139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Socha K, Karpińska E, Kochanowicz J, Soroczyńska J, Jakoniuk M, Wilkiel M, et al. Dietary habits; concentration of copper, zinc, and Cu-to-Zn ratio in serum and ability status of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Nutrition. 2017;39–40: 76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dembinska-Kiec A, Naskalski J. [Diagnostyka laboratoryjna z elementami biochemii klinicznej] (in Polish). 4th ed. Wrocław Poland: Edra Urban & Partner; 2017. p. 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Młynarczyk M, Falkowska M, Micun Z, Obuchowska I, Kochanowicz J, Socha K, et al. Diet, oxidative stress, and blood serum nutrients in various types of glaucoma: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14: 1421. doi: 10.3390/nu14071421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Himori N, Inoue Yanagimachi M, Omodaka K, Shiga Y, Tsuda S, Kunikata H, et al. The effect of dietary antioxidant supplementation in patients with glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15: 2293–2300. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S314288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol. 2014;24: R453–R462. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pinazo-Durán MD, Zanón-Moreno V, Gallego-Pinazo R, García-Medina JJ. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial failure in the pathogenesis of glaucoma neurodegeneration. Prog Brain Res. 2015;220: 127–153. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brenneisen P, Steinbrenner H, Sies H. Selenium, oxidative stress, and health aspects. Mol Aspects Med. 2005;26: 256–267. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bruhn RL, Stamer WD, Herrygers LA, Levine JM, Noecker RJ. Relationship between glaucoma and selenium levels in plasma and aqueous humour. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93: 1155–1158. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.125997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lucio M, Fick A, Michalke B, Laemmer R, Hosari S, Hohberger B. Serum selenium levels in glaucoma: a pilot study. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2022;239: 326–330. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-2816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kieliszek M, Błażejak S. Current knowledge on the importance of selenium in food for living organisms: A review. Molecules. 2016;21: 609. doi: 10.3390/molecules21050609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kieliszek M. Selenium–fascinating microelement, properties and sources in food. Molecules. 2019;24: 1298. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luty-Frackiewicz A, Jethon Z, Januszewska L. Effect of smoking and alcohol consumption on the serum selenium level of Lower Silesian population. Sci Total Environ. 2002;285: 89–95. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00898-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Selenium Alexander J. In: Bock G, Goode J, editors. Dietary supplements and health. Novartis Foundation; 2007. pp. 143–153. doi: 10.1002/9780470319444.ch10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pot SA, Chandler HL, Colitz CM, Bentley E, Dubielzig RR, Mosley TS, et al. Selenium functionalized intraocular lenses inhibit posterior capsule opacification in an ex vivo canine lens capsular bag assay. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89: 728–734. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Akyol N, Değer O, Keha EE, Kiliç S. Aqueous humour and serum zinc and copper concentrations of patients with glaucoma and cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74: 661–662. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.11.661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perera NCN, Godahewa GI, Lee J. Copper-zinc-superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD), an antioxidant gene from seahorse (Hippocampus abdominalis); molecular cloning, sequence characterization, antioxidant activity and potential peroxidation function of its recombinant protein. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;57: 386–399. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.08.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hohberger B, Chaudhri MA, Michalke B, Lucio M, Nowomiejska K, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, et al. Levels of aqueous humor trace elements in patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018;45: 150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mousa A, Kondkar AA, Al-Obeidan SA, Azad TA, Sultan T, Osman E, et al. Association of total antioxidants level with glaucoma type and severity. Saudi Med J. 2015;36: 671–677. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.6.10697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cremonini E, Fraga CG, Oteiza PI. (-)-Epicatechin in the control of glucose homeostasis: Involvement of redox-regulated mechanisms. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130: 478–488. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yung-Hsiang Chen

6 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-43349Dietary patterns; serum concentrations of selenium, copper, and zinc; Cu/Zn ratio; and total antioxidant status in patients with glaucomaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Konopińska,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Thank you for submitting the following manuscript to PLOS ONE.Please revise the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments and upload the revised file.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 22 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yung-Hsiang Chen, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for submitting the following manuscript to PLOS ONE.

Please revise the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments and upload the revised file.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Abstract

I think there is a typographic error in the abstract. Did you measure the concentration of the trace elements in the aqueous humor?

patients with glaucoma had higher Se levels?

Introduction

Glaucoma is the FIRST leading cause of irreversible blindness.

The only MODIFIABLE risk factor for glaucoma is elevated IOP.

Provide references for lines 67-70.

Line 81: The concentration of the trace elements does not essentially determine the occurrence of glaucoma. Also, this should be corrected in the abstract.

Methods

Use corrected distance visual acuity instead of BCVA.

Discussion

Line 338-339: How do you justify the discrepancy between your study and Bruhn et al. study?

I recommend a detailed discussion on the pathophysiological differences between POAG, PXG, and PACG and also the impact of the concertation of the trace elements on the specific type of glaucoma.

Reviewer #2: The work ´Dietary patterns; serum concentrations of selenium, copper, and zinc; Cu/Zn ratio; and total antioxidant status in patients with glaucoma` aimed to identify the biochemical parameters that determine the occurrence of glaucoma and to assess the correlation between oxidative stress and clinical data in patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. It provides insights on the glaucoma population and the amount of individuals enrolled is relevant. However, some improvements of the manuscript are required for its publication.

- The goal of the manuscript seems to be ambitious, as 3 trace elements and total oxidant status were used to identify biochemical parameters that determine the occurrence of glaucoma.

- Introduction

Line 50. ´This indicates the presence of undefined molecular mechanisms underlying glaucoma development´. Is this applicable to onset and progression of glaucoma?

Some references must be added along the introduction:

Lines 65-67. Reference on aqueous humor.

Line 70. Reference.

Line 76. Reference.

- Line 83. A comparison with other, at least European, data in serum of healthy and glaucoma patients may be added (if possible) in the results/discussion of the manuscript.

-Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Line 112. Was the presence of cataracts in the healthy population considered?

- Mineral component and total antioxidant status determination. Line 154. The obtained and certified values must be added to the manuscript with the subsequent statistical evaluation. Indicate how is expressed the precision (RSD?)

- Line 159. Please, rephrase the sentence. It is not clear what is compared. Reference values correspond to…

- Demographic characteristics of the study groups. Table 1 is not referenced in the text.

- Lines 189-190. The age must be indicated with three significant digits (one number after comma)

- Line 198. ´Study and control group´. Replace study by glaucoma group.

- Line 205. Please, clarify or define r

- Lines 224-226. Please, revise grammatically this sentence.

- Line 251. Can be this patient an outlier? If so, could it be excluded for the statistical comparison?

- Line 268. Does this group of individuals have lower consumption of fish? This should be considered as it is a major source of Se compared to the other food products.

- Table 6. It can be included in the supporting information.

- Lines 333-334. Please, add reference

- Lines 341-342. Please, rephrase the sentence.

- Line 353. Please, harmonize the units of the concentrations.

As a general remark, was the comparison/evaluation of the food consumption performed by separate groups (glaucoma group and healthy group)? Was any difference found?

Line 344. Was the diet of the glaucoma patients enriched in Se? This is not clear along the manuscript (section of inclusion/exclusion criteria and discussion).

Reviewer #3: This study is very interseting and suitable for publication

Only English edition should be done before publication

This study should be effect the treatment of glaucoma and this condition is very important for glaucoma progression

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0301511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301511.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Mar 2024

Responses to the Editorial Board Members’ comments

March 03 2024

Dear Editorial Board Members and Reviewers,

We would like to thank you for the detailed review of our manuscript and your valuable remarks. The manuscript has been rechecked, and the necessary changes have been made in accordance with the Reviewers’ suggestions. The responses to all comments have been prepared and are provided below. We hope that you will find our explanations and manuscript modifications satisfactory and consider the revised manuscript for publication in PLoS One.

Reviewer 1.

Comment 1: Abstract

I think there is a typographic error in the abstract. Did you measure the concentration of the trace elements in the aqueous humor?

Response: We appreciate your attention to detail; indeed, it is a typographical error. We analyzed the levels of trace elements (selenium, copper, zinc, and Cu/Zn ratio) and total antioxidant status (TAS) in blood serum samples. Following your recommendation, we have incorporated the necessary corrections into the article.

Comment 2: patients with glaucoma had higher Se levels?

Response: This is another typographical error, in fact, the total Se serum levels are lower in patients with glaucoma than in control participants. We have corrected this mistake.

Comment 3: Introduction

Glaucoma is the FIRST leading cause of irreversible blindness.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out, we corrected it.

Comment 4: The only MODIFIABLE risk factor for glaucoma is elevated IOP.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out, we corrected it.

Comment 5: Provide references for lines 67-70.

Response: Thank you for this comment. We have added the appropriate references which can be found as references number 7 and 8 in the reference list.

Comment 6: Line 81:The concentration of the trace elements does not essentially determine the occurrence of glaucoma. Also, this should be corrected in the abstract.

Response: We appreciate this pertinent comment. We have changed these statements in the manuscript.

Comment 7: Methods

Use corrected distance visual acuity instead of BCVA.

Response: Thank you for this suggestion. We have changed the terminology in the entire manuscript.

Comment 8: Discussion

Line 338-339: How do you justify the discrepancy between your study and Bruhn et al. study?

Response: Thank you for this insightful comment. We believe that one of the factors contributing to the discrepancies between these two studies could be racial differences. The participants in Bruhn et al. were predominantly of Hispanic ethnicity, comprising almost 80% of their study population. In contrast, our study population consisted entirely of individuals of Caucasian ethnicity. Additionally, the poor dietary habits regarding selenium intake in our population may have significantly influenced the results when compared to the Hispanic study group in Bruhn et al. Moreover, as indicated on lines 376-387, soils in Poland, particularly in our region, are considerably deficient in total selenium content. These might be the factors that determine the differences between those two papers. We have added an appropriate explanation to the Discussion section (lines 405-411).

Comment 9: I recommend a detailed discussion on the pathophysiological differences between POAG, PXG, and PACG and also the impact of the concertation of the trace elements on the specific type of glaucoma.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. In fact, we conducted an analysis comparing the concentration of trace elements in various types of glaucoma. However, our study revealed no significant differences. Therefore, we opted not to discuss this topic further. Following your recommendation, we have added Table 6 presenting the results from our statistical analysis, as well as a chapter in the Discussion section as follows (lines 462-472):

Pathophysiological differences between POAG, PEXG, and PACG

Glaucoma is a disease of multifactorial etiology. Under physiological conditions, aqueous humor flows from the posterior to the anterior eye chamber and is then drained via outflow pathways including the trabecular meshwork, choroidal-scleral pathway, and the iris. In POAG, the outflow of the aqueous humor is hindered due to increased resistance at the level of these outflow tracts. One of the most common causes of secondary open-angle glaucoma is PEXG, associated with the deposition of protein-like material within the anterior segment of the eye, especially in the iridocorneal angle and lens capsule. In PACG, the peripheral part of the iris overlaps the trabecular meshwork, blocking the outflow of the aqueous humor. Although, we hypothesized possible effects of trace element concentrations on specific glaucoma types, our study revealed no significant differences.

Table 6. Comparison of Se, Zn, Cu, and TAS levels and Cu/Zn ratio between glaucoma types.

Variable POAG (n = 58) PEXG (n = 16) PACG (n = 17) Other types (n = 7) p

Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3) Mean ± SD Median (Q1; Q3)

Se, mg/L 66.44 ± 17.37 63.74 (55.42; 75.97) 76.40 ± 18.53 71.05 (63.23; 81.46) 72.73 ± 17.14 72.81 (59.88; 83.02) 67.63 ± 11.38 66.91 (59.78; 76.19) 0.175

Zn, mg/L 0.77 ± 0.14 0.76 (0.68; 0.85) 0.74 ± 0.09 0.77 (0.70; 0.81) 0.76 ± 0.09 0.76 (0.71; 0.82) 0.77 ± 0.11 0.75 (0.71; 0.82) 0.912

Cu, mg/L 1.05 ± 0.36 1.02 (0.83; 1.28) 1.22 ± 0.32 1.17 (1.05; 1.45) 1.03 ± 0.28 1.07 (0.92; 1.17) 1.17 ± 0.30 1.16 (0.99; 1.26) 0.281

Cu/Zn, molar ratio 1.45 ± 0.55 1.38 (1.02; 1.79) 1.72 ± 0.56 1.61 (1.38; 1.94) 1.42 ± 0.41 1.47 (1.20; 1.71) 1.56 ± 0.35 1.67 (1.28; 1.79) 0.263

TAS, mmol/L 1.53 ± 0.25 1.52 (1.40; 1.65) 1.53 ± 0.28 1.55 (1.42; 1.64) 1.49 ± 0.35 1.58 (1.43; 1.64) 1.51 ± 0.17 1.50 (1.45; 1.65) 0.9771

Notes: POAG; PEXG, ; PACG, ; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation. Data were compared with ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test1.

Reviewer #2:

Comment 1: Introduction

Line 50. ´This indicates the presence of undefined molecular mechanisms underlying glaucoma development´. Is this applicable to onset and progression of glaucoma?

Response: Thank you for this pertinent comment. Accordingly, we have slightly changed this sentence as follows:

“This might indicate the presence of undefined molecular mechanisms underlying glaucoma development.”

Comment 2: Some references must be added along the introduction:

Lines 65-67. Reference on aqueous humor, and line 70. Reference.

Response: Thank you for bringing attention to missing references. We added the following reference at line 70.

Comment 3: Line 76. Reference.

Response: Thank you for this comment, we added an appropriate reference which can be found as reference 10 in the bibliography.

Comment 4: Line 83. A comparison with other, at least European, data in serum of healthy and glaucoma patients may be added (if possible) in the results/discussion of the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. During our search in medical databases, we did not find similar studies to ours. Most publications either evaluated only the concentrations of trace elements in serum or aqueous humor without assessing the potential role of oxidative stress or assessed the role of oxidative stress without connecting it to the levels of trace elements. In our work, we compare trace elements that regulate oxidative stress, which can influence the development of glaucoma. Hence, we cannot compare those papers with our study.

Comment 5: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Line 112. Was the presence of cataracts in the healthy population considered?

Response: Thank you for this question. Yes, patients with cataract were excluded from the study. We have added this information to the Methods section.

Comment 6: Mineral component and total antioxidant status determination. Line 154. The obtained and certified values must be added to the manuscript with the subsequent statistical evaluation. Indicate how is expressed the precision (RSD?)

Response: In response to your question, we have added the results of the method checks to the table. Precision is in this study expressed as a compactness factor in %, which is SD divided by the value for the six individual materials of the certificate multiplied by 100.

Comment 7: Line 159. Please, rephrase the sentence. It is not clear what is compared. Reference values correspond to…

Response: Thank you for your comment. We have rephrased the sentence as follows: “The serum concentrations of Se, Cu, and Zn in the glaucoma group were subsequently evaluated in comparison to the reference values of healthy controls (66–104 µg/L, 0.7–1.6 mg/L, and 0.7–1.3 mg/L, respectively) [11].” (lines 191-193).

Comment 7: Demographic characteristics of the study groups. Table 1 is not referenced in the text.

Response: Thank you for this comment. Table 1 is now referenced on line 224.

Comment 8: Lines 189-190. The age must be indicated with three significant digits (one number after comma)

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We have corrected our data reporting.

Comment 9: Line 198. ´Study and control group´. Replace study by glaucoma group.

Response: Thank you for this suggestion. We fully agree with your comment and have corrected it in the entire manuscript.

Comment 10: Line 205. Please, clarify or define r

Response: Spearman’s rank test correlation coefficient allows to determine whether there is a linear relationship between two variables, and if so, it allows us to determine its strength and its direction, i.e., whether the correlation is positive or negative.

Comment 11: Lines 224-226. Please, revise grammatically this sentence.

Response: Thank you for this comment. We have rephrased the sentence as follows:

“Significantly lower serum levels of Se and Zn were observed in men (67.7 ± 17.14 μg/L and 0.76 ± 0.11 mg/L, respectively) and women (68.73 ± 16.21 μg/L and 0.76 ± 0.13 mg/L, respectively) diagnosed with glaucoma than in healthy men (78.64 ± 15.13 μg/L and 0.82 ± 0.21 mg/L, respectively) and women (88.23 ± 56.43 μg/L and 0.71 ± 0.14 mg/L, respectively).” (lines 236-240).

Comment 12: Line 251. Can be this patient an outlier? If so, could it be excluded for the statistical comparison?

Response: Thank you for this comment. We excluded the patient from the study.

Comment 13: Line 268. Does this group of individuals have lower consumption of fish? This should be considered as it is a major source of Se compared to the other food products.

Response: Thank you for your insightful comment. We agree with your point and added the following explanation to the Methods section: “For this study, consumption was frequent if specific food products were consumed twice to thrice weekly or more, except for fish and fish products, for which consumption once or more weekly was considered frequent. Food items consumed less frequently were categorized as those consumed once or more weekly. This categorization aligns with the recommendations of the Committee on Human Nutrition Science of the Polish Academy of Sciences for assessing the frequency of consuming specific food products.” (lines 131-137).

Moreover, we added these data to the Results section: “In the glaucoma group, the effect of fish consumption as a source of selenium was statistically significant; patients who consumed fish more frequently had higher selenium levels compared to those who consumed fish less frequently (without considering other dietary factors).“ (lines 301-303).

We also added Table 8 as follows:

Table 8. Relationship between the frequency of fish consumption and the serum concentration of selenium in patients with glaucoma.

Fish consumption frequency Number of patients with glaucoma Concentration of selenium in serum (µg/L) p

Frequent (more than once a week) 51 74.92 ± 17.49 < 0.005*

Seldom (less or equal to once a week) 53 64.87 ± 13.40

Comment 14: Table 6. It can be included in the supporting information.

Response: Thank you for this remark. We have moved this table to the Supplementary data as the S1 Table.

Comment 15: Lines 333-334. Please, add reference

Response: Thank you for this comment. Following your suggestion, we have added an appropriate reference.

Comment 16: Lines 341-342. Please, rephrase the sentence.

Response: Thank you for that remark. We have rephrased the sentence.

Comment 16: Line 353. Please, harmonize the units of the concentrations.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. Accordingly, we corrected the units throughout our manuscript.

Comment 17: As a general remark, was the comparison/evaluation of the food consumption performed by separate groups (glaucoma group and healthy group)? Was any difference found?

Response: Thank you for this remark. Unfortunately, this statistical analysis was only performed in the glaucoma group, so we cannot compare the groups.

Comment 18: Line 344. Was the diet of the glaucoma patients enriched in Se? This is not clear along the manuscript (section of inclusion/exclusion criteria and discussion).

Response: In response to your comment, we have carefully revised the Methods section to include a more detailed explanation about excluding patients with any pharmacological supplementation: “Additionally, individuals taking dietary vitamin supplements, especially those containing Se, Zn, or Cu, or medications that could potentially affect the trace element levels were excluded from the study.” (lines 117-120).

Reviewer #3:

Comment 1: This study is very interesting and suitable for publication

Only English edition should be done before publication

This study should be effect the treatment of glaucoma and this condition is very important for glaucoma progression

Response: Thank you for your encouraging comments and the constructive feedback regarding the quality of the data presentation in our manuscript. We have revised the entire manuscript as advised. We have add the English editing certificate as a supplementary file.

Decision Letter 1

Yung-Hsiang Chen

19 Mar 2024

Dietary patterns; serum concentrations of selenium, copper, and zinc; copper/zinc ratio; and total antioxidant status in patients with glaucoma

PONE-D-23-43349R1

Dear Dr. Konopińska,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yung-Hsiang Chen, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Congratulations on the acceptance of your manuscript, and thank you for your interest in submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: As a small remark and following a previous comment, it is convenient that the experimental data obtained for the reference material (Seronorm serum) will be added to the manuscript, and also to indicate in the manuscript how the precision is expressed.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Yung-Hsiang Chen

22 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-43349R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Konopińska,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yung-Hsiang Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Relationships between frequency of food product consumption and serum Se, Cu, Zn, and TAS levels according to multiple stepwise regression analysis.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301511.s001.docx (15.3KB, docx)
    S1 File. Certificate of English language editing.

    (PDF)

    pone.0301511.s002.pdf (272.3KB, pdf)
    S2 File. Dataset used to statistical analysis.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301511.s003.docx (255.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES