Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 2;15:2697. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46093-2

Table 1.

Eggshell densities (number of eggshells per liter of sediment) and ubiquities (number of sediment samples with eggshells per site) by site and date

Site Number of screeneds
amplesa
Age of samples Liters of sediment Number of eggshell fragments Ubiquity Density
Bash Tepa 30 400 BC– AD 100 764 460 0.7 (70%) 0.602
Paykend 1b (Citadel) 10 5th century BC–5th century AD 350.5 20 0.3 (30%) 0.057
LVD-HA-K7 (Burial Mound) Handpicked 1st century BC–1st century AD
Panjakent (Kainar-citadel) 9 5–7th centuries AD 116.5 25 0.88 (88%) 0.215
Kafir Kala Handpicked 4–12th centuries AD
Panjiakent (Main town) 11 7–8th centuries AD 264.5 56 0.64 (64%) 0.211
Ming Tepa Handpicked 7–8th centuries AD
Sanjar-Shah 5 8–9th centuries AD 65.5 26 0.8 (80%) 0.397
Kuk-Tosh 6 9–12th centuries AD 79 2,847 0.83 (83%) 36.038
Bukhara 26 9–12th centuries AD 939.5 871 0.46 (46%) 0.927
Tashbulak 22 10–12th centuries AD 223.5 95 0.23 (23%) 0.425
Afrasiab 1 10–12th centuries AD 255 855 1 (100%) 3.352
Paykend 2 (Shakhristan) 2 10–12th centuries AD 55 101 0.5 (50%) 1.836
Paykend 3 – (Rabat4) 20 10–12th centuries AD 357.5 90 0.5 (50%) 0.251

aPaykend 1 and 2 represent the Citadel and Shakhristan II areas excavated during 2019; while Paykend 3 represents the neighboring medieval caravansary (Rabat-4). Samples from Kafir Kala and LVD-HA-K7 were handpicked and therefore ubiquities and densities cannot be calculated.

bIn this case, a sample refers to a large sampling of sediments, in many cases close to 10 liters, from anthropogenic contexts.