Table 6.
Indicators for assessing sugarcane agroindustry supply chain sustainability.
| No | Indicators | Benchmark |
T |
Z |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| u | U | Mill A | Mill B | |||
| E1 | Supply chain risk | Very low | Very high | Very low | High | High |
| E2 | Sugar production loss | |||||
| E2.1. Pol blotong | 0.000 | 2.600 | 0.000 | 2.400 | 2.030 | |
| E2.2. Pol ampas | 0.000 | 2.000 | 0.000 | 1.350 | 1.290 | |
| E2.3. Pol tetes | 0.000 | 30.000 | 0.000 | 29.400 | 28.830 | |
| E2.4. Sugar content loss (%) | 0.000 | 0.640 | 0.000 | 0.490 | 0.490 | |
| E3 | Fair Profit allocation among stakeholders (%) | 15.000 | 30.000 | 15.000 | 20.000 | 20.000 |
| E4 | Sugarcane price benchmark for farmer (IDR) | 0.000 | 6.870 | 0.000 | 2.000 | 3.000 |
| E5 | Supply chain Agility (%) | 0.000 | 25.000 | 25.000 | 3.448 | 15.000 |
| E6 | Return on Investment (%) | 0.000 | 50.000 | 50.000 | 29.000 | 22.560 |
| S1 | Institutional support | Very low | Very high | Very high | Very low | Very low |
| S2 | Supply chain infrastructure support | Worst | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Excellent |
| S3 | Corporate social responsibility | Worst | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good |
| S4 | Waste complaints | Very rare | Very frequent | Very rare | Rare | Very rare |
| S5 | Local labor employability (%) | 0 | 100 | 100 | 34.190 | 25.862 |
| S6 | Stakeholder partnership (%) | 0 | 15 | 15 | 4.000 | 6.572 |
| L1 | Odor and dust disruption | Very low | Very high | Very low | Low | low |
| L2 | Emission (/Ton) | 0.000 | 0.236 | 0.000 | 0.156 | 0.171 |
| L3 | Noisy level | |||||
| L3.1 Workspace noisy level (db) | 50.000 | 85.000 | 50.000 | 56.00 | 52.40 | |
| L3.2 Open space noisy level (db) | 40.000 | 80.000 | 40.000 | 59.00 | 55.70 | |
| L4 | Water quality | |||||
| L4.1. TSS (mg/L) | 0.000 | 25.000 | 0.000 | 5.00 | 42.70 | |
| L4.2. BOD5 (mg/L) | 0.000 | 60.000 | 0.000 | 3.52 | 47.20 | |
| L4.3. COD (mg/L) | 0.000 | 150.000 | 0.000 | 26.12 | 94.80 | |
| L4.4. Sulfide (mg/L) | 0.000 | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.01 | 0.04 | |
| L5 | Ambient air quality | 0.000 | 262.000 | 0.000 | 15.20 | 7.60 |
| L5.1. Sulfur dioxide (μg/Nm3) | 0.000 | 10000.000 | 0.000 | 1955.00 | 2300.00 | |
| L5.2. carbon monoxide (μg/Nm3) | 0.000 | 92.500 | 0.000 | 70.40 | 7.90 | |
| L5.3. Nitrogen dioxide (μg/m3) | 0.000 | 230.000 | 0.000 | 216.00 | 72.50 | |
| L5.3. Dust (μg/Nm3) | 0.0067 | 0.8 | 0.0067 | 0.36 | 0.50 | |
| L6 | Solid waste emision | 0.000 | 0.236 | 0.000 | 0.156 | 0.171 |
| R1 | Resource accessibility | Very low | Very high | Very high | Very high | Moderate |
| R2 | Level of sugarcane area conversion (%) | 0 | 15 | 0 | 4.28 | 8.046 |
| R3 | Labor competency | |||||
| R3.1. Productivity (%) | 50 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 80 | |
| R3.2. Training hours (%) | 0 | 67.5 | 67.5 | 4.465 | 4.465 | |
| R4 | Raw material quality | |||||
| R4.1. Productivity (Ton/Ha) | 55 | 88 | 88 | 88.06 | 88.06 | |
| R4.2. Sugar content (%) | 6 | 10 | 10 | 7.3 | 7.3 | |
| R4.3. Sweet, clean, and fresh quality. | Very low | Very high | Very high | High | Moderate | |
| R5 | Overall recovery (%) | 75 | 85 | 85 | 81.15 | 82.22 |
| R6 | Raw material availability (%) | 80 | 95 | 95 | 91 | 88 |
| R7 | Ratoon level | 3 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| R8 | Responsive sugarcane variety availability | 0 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 85 |
| R9 | The availability of machinery and tools cultivation | Very low | Very high | Very high | Low | Low |
| R10 | Raw sugar technology adoption | Very low | Very high | Very high | Moderate | Moderate |