Table 3.
Group | Description | fx2 | fx1 | fx3 | fx2+fx1+fx3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fruits | Observed frequency | 115.00 | 74.00 | 40.00 | 229 |
Expected frequency | 95.93 | 66.04 | 66.04 | 229 | |
Adjusted Residue | 3.17 | 1.26 | −4.71 | ||
Vegetables | Observed frequency | 104.00 | 93.00 | 116.00 | 313 |
Expected frequency | 131.69 | 90.66 | 90.66 | 313 | |
Adjusted Residue | −4.38 | 0.40 | 4.37 | ||
Others | Observed frequency | 56.00 | 24.00 | 34.00 | 114 |
Expected frequency | 48.38 | 33.31 | 33.31 | 114 | |
Adjusted Residue | 1.79 | −2.11 | 0.16 |
Test | Value | df | Sig* |
Qui-square | 31.91 | 4 | 0.000 |
Phi | 0.221 | 0.000 | |
N of valid cases | 656 |
Note: *Chi-square test at the significance level of p < 0.001.
We can assess the significance between the observed values comprising the data extracted from scientific studies and the expected values for each category. Residual values between −1.96 and 1.96 (−1.96 ≤ Adjusted residuals ≤1.96) do not indicate a significant difference between the expected and observed frequency. Thus, we observed a significant difference in the ‘fruits’ and ‘vegetables’ group for the fx3 and fx2 syntheses and in the ‘others’ group for the fx1 syntheses. For example, the group of vegetables has a lower tendency to show divergence (fx3) than convergence (fx2) in the value of the nutritional and residual parameters when comparing organic and conventional foods.