Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;10(7):e28288. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28288

Table 3.

Chi-square test comparing convergence/divergence syntheses among food groups.

Group Description fx2 fx1 fx3 fx2+fx1+fx3
Fruits Observed frequency 115.00 74.00 40.00 229
Expected frequency 95.93 66.04 66.04 229
Adjusted Residue 3.17 1.26 −4.71
Vegetables Observed frequency 104.00 93.00 116.00 313
Expected frequency 131.69 90.66 90.66 313
Adjusted Residue −4.38 0.40 4.37
Others Observed frequency 56.00 24.00 34.00 114
Expected frequency 48.38 33.31 33.31 114
Adjusted Residue 1.79 −2.11 0.16
Test Value df Sig*
Qui-square 31.91 4 0.000
Phi 0.221 0.000
N of valid cases 656

Note: *Chi-square test at the significance level of p < 0.001.

We can assess the significance between the observed values comprising the data extracted from scientific studies and the expected values for each category. Residual values between −1.96 and 1.96 (−1.96 ≤ Adjusted residuals ≤1.96) do not indicate a significant difference between the expected and observed frequency. Thus, we observed a significant difference in the ‘fruits’ and ‘vegetables’ group for the fx3 and fx2 syntheses and in the ‘others’ group for the fx1 syntheses. For example, the group of vegetables has a lower tendency to show divergence (fx3) than convergence (fx2) in the value of the nutritional and residual parameters when comparing organic and conventional foods.