Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 18;74(2):335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.10.012

Table 3.

Assessment of risk of bias.

Critical appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews Hakan Arslan Ozgur Genc Sen Mahta Fazlyab
Was true randomisation used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? Yes Yes Yes
Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? Yes Yes Yes
Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? Yes Yes Yes
Were participants blind to treatment assignment? Yes Yes Yes
Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? Yes Yes Yes
Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? Yes Unclear Yes
Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? Yes Yes Yes
Was follow-up complete and, if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analysed? Yes Yes Yes
Were participants analysed in the groups to which they were randomised? Yes Yes Yes
Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? Yes Yes Yes
Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Yes Yes Yes
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes Yes Yes
Was the trial design appropriate and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomisation, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial? Yes Yes Yes