Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 19;26:e51108. doi: 10.2196/51108

Table 1.

Characteristics of participating NSWa schools (N=9) and students (N=1331) at baseline.


Intervention Control
School and canteen characteristics (intervention: n=4 schools; control: n=5 schools)

School sector, n (%)


Government 1 (25) 2 (40)


Nongovernmentb 3 (75) 3 (60)

School type, n (%)


Combined school (students aged 5-19 years) 3 (75) 2 (40)


High school (students aged 12-19 years) 1 (25) 3 (60)

Number of enrollmentsc, mean (SD) 496 (226) 800 (318)

Socioeconomic status of schoold, n (%)


Least advantaged 1 (25) 2 (40)


Most advantaged 3 (75) 3 (60)

Canteen days of operatione, n (%)


Five days a week 4 (100) 5 (100)

Canteen menu characteristicsf, n (%)


In total, ≥75% “Everyday” items on menu 2 (50) 2 (40)


No “Should not be sold” items on menu 0 (0) 0 (0)

Number of weekly online lunch orders per schoole, mean (SD) 141 (62) 135 (77)
User characteristicse (intervention: n=656 participants; control: n=675 participants)

Grade of student at baseline, n (%)


Grade 7-9 503 (77) 541 (80)


Grade 10-11 153 (23) 134 (20)

Frequency of use, n (%)


High users (≥1 order per week on average) 166 (25) 219 (32)


Low users (<1 order per week on average) 490 (75) 456 (68)

aNSW: New South Wales.

bNongovernment schools were Catholic and independent schools.

cBased on publicly available school statistics (MySchool 2020) or verbally from schools (combined schools only).

dSocio-Economic Indexes for Australia 2016, based on the postcode of the school locality and dichotomized at the NSW median.

eBased on Flexischools purchasing data.

fAs classified by a dietitian according to the New South Wales Healthy School Canteen Strategy.