Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2014 Jun 12;192(6):1650–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.017

Table 3.

Patient and tumor characteristics of 38,634 men with localized prostate cancer without primary malignancy stratified by type of local treatment.

No local therapy

(n=8,832; 22.9%)
Prostatectomy
(n=15,421;
39.9%)
Radiation
Therapy
(n = 13,855;
35.9%)
Local Destruction

(n = 526; 1.4%)
p-value#
Age < 0.001
  Median 65 61 68 70
  Range 33–103 33–90 37–99 43–93

Race < 0.001
  White 5673 64.2% 11149 72.3% 9135 65.9% 372 70.7%
  Black 1304 14.8% 1969 12.8% 2483 17.9% 88 16.7%
  Hispanic 689 7.8% 1334 8.7% 1153 8.3% 35 6.7%
  Asian/Pacific Islander 379 4.3% 722 4.7% 636 4.6% 23 4.4%
  Native American 45 0.5% 48 0.3% 40 0.3% 1 0.2%
  Other/Unknown 742 8.4% 199 1.3% 408 2.9% 7 1.3%

Marital status < 0.001
  Married 4593 52.0% 11735 76.1% 9242 66.7% 371 70.5%
  Not married 2050 23.2% 2787 18.1% 3242 23.4% 114 21.7%
  Unknown 2189 24.8% 899 5.8% 1371 9.9% 41 7.8%

County poverty rate < 0.001
  Highest rate quartile 2209 25.0% 4027 26.1% 3269 23.6% 119 22.6%
  3rd quartile 2218 25.1% 3740 24.3% 3609 26.0% 152 28.9%
  2nd quartile 2331 26.4% 4022 26.1% 3149 22.7% 140 26.6%
  Lowest rate quartile 2071 23.4% 3630 23.5% 3825 27.6% 115 21.9%
  Unknown 3 0.0% 2 0.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0%

SEER Registry < 0.001
  SF/Oakland 681 7.7% 654 4.2% 804 5.8% 15 2.9%
  Connecticut 392 4.4% 800 5.2% 603 4.4% 5 1.0%
  Detroit 508 5.8% 970 6.3% 972 7.0% 97 18.4%
  Hawaii/Alaska 82 0.9% 222 1.4% 189 1.4% 11 2.1%
  Iowa 267 3.0% 665 4.3% 505 3.6% 13 2.5%
  New Mexico 308 3.5% 347 2.3% 277 2.0% 3 0.6%
  Seattle 631 7.1% 1000 6.5% 607 4.4% 50 9.5%
  Utah 359 4.1% 477 3.1% 363 2.6% 36 6.8%
  Atlanta 312 3.5% 416 2.7% 718 5.2% 28 5.3%
  San Jose-Monterey 328 3.7% 418 2.7% 570 4.1% 4 0.8%
  Los Angeles 611 6.9% 1715 11.1% 774 5.6% 8 1.5%
  CA excluding SF/SJM/LA 1862 21.1% 3435 22.3% 2550 18.4% 121 23.0%
  Kentucky 298 3.4% 877 5.7% 650 4.7% 21 4.0%
  Louisiana 672 7.6% 950 6.2% 902 6.5% 33 6.3%
  New Jersey 875 9.9% 1540 10.0% 1938 14.0% 36 6.8%
  Greater/Rural Georgia 646 7.3% 935 6.1% 1433 10.3% 45 8.6%

NCCN Risk < 0.001
  Low 4379 49.6% 5964 38.7% 4437 32.0% 159 30.2%
  Intermediate 2407 27.3% 6396 41.5% 5887 42.5% 247 47.0%
  High 2046 23.2% 2521 16.3% 3531 25.5% 120 22.8%
#

Comparison across risk groups. Chi-square statistic for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables

SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network; SF = San Francisco; CA = California; SJM = San Jose-Monterey; LA = Los Angeles