Table 2.
Classification and description of target antigens in TCR-T cell therapy
| Categories | Shared antigens and genes in solid tumors | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TAAs -Endogenous wild-type proteins |
Tissue differentiation antigens |
• gp100 [35] TYRP1[38] • mesothelin [39] |
Antigen ubiquity: widely shared between patients; widely shared under tumor heterogeneity Easier to recognize, isolate and validate Relatively mature, have undergone clinical tests |
Prone to immune evasion under affinity limitation Relatively poor effect, easily tolerated Autosomal cross-reactions have been widely reported, causing multiple injuries and even death |
| Cancer germline antigens |
• MAGE-A [48-53] • BAGE [54] • SAGE [55] • SSX [58] • LAGE [59] • SCP1 [60] • PRAME[61] |
|||
|
TSAs (neoantigens) -Somatic mutant proteins |
Neoantigens from genomic mutations: SNVs; Indels; Fusion genes; Chromosomal structural abnormalities |
SNVs • IDH1 [68] • JAK2 [69] • BRAF [70] • CDK4 [71] • CDK12 [72] • NRAS [65] • CTNNB1 [73] • GAS7 [74] Indels • NPM1 [75] • CALR [76] • TGFBR2 [77] Fusion genes • BRD4-NUT [78] • NRG1 [82] |
No expression in normal somatic cells No T cell thymocyte selection and central immune tolerance Individuation, more in line with the heterogeneity of patients with tumors, new therapeutic potential |
Need to predict and characterize, more cost of time and resources Need to find commonality Immature and difficult to validate Unknown risk of cross-reactivity |
| Viral neoantigens (viral open reading frames) |
• HPV-16 E7 • HPV-16 E6 |
|||
| Neoantigens of transcriptomic variants | • COL6A3-FLNV [83] | |||
|
Neoantigens of proteomic variation/ abnormal antigenic peptide presentation |
• LUAD [84] | |||
| MiHAs | A large antigen library distinct from MHC presentation | Available applications in hematologic malignancies | Strict requirement of individual matching |
TAA tumor-associated antigen, TSA tumor-specific antigen, MiHA minor histocompatibility antigen, SNV single nucleotide variation