Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Nov 28;53(2):284–293. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01911-6

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics and Comparison between Non-Hispanic White sample and Black and Hispanic samples

Subsample comparison
Characteristics Entire sample (N = 7712) Non-Hispanic White (N = 5096) Black and Hispanic (N = 2616)


n (%) or Mean (SD) n (%) or Mean (SD) n (%) or Mean (SD) p-valuea

Male 4079 (52.9%) 2731 (53.6%) 1348 (51.5%) .087
Age, months 119.00 (7.51) 119.17 (7.56) 118.68 (7.38) .006
Family SES risk index 0.42 (0.72) 0.21 (0.49) 0.83 (0.90) <.001
Neighborhood ADI 38.76 (25.73) 32.66 (21.25) 50.66 (29.29) <.001
NIHTBX executive function 373.32 (31.22) 378.34 (28.86) 363.53 (33.27) <.001
Pubertal development index −0.08 (2.13) −0.47 (1.85) 0.70 (2.41) <.001
Pubertal development index (Year 1) −0.07 (257) −0.49 (2.41) 0.75 (2.69) <.001

Notes: All measures reported at baseline unless noted. Pubertal development index values at baseline ranged from 1 to 19 (of a potential scale range of 1 to 20), with a mean of 8.85 and median value of 8.50.

a

p-value determined from T-test for continuous and ordinal variables; chi-square cross-tab for binary variables.