Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 20;9:1368594. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1368594

Table 3.

Predicted job satisfaction from partial proportional odds ordered logistic regression with robust standard errors.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Coef SE OR Coef SE OR Coef SE OR Coef SE OR
Work location status
Work from home −0.42 (0.21) * 0.65 −0.55 (0.22) * 0.58 0.18 (0.21) 1.19 0.06 (0.24) 1.07
Gender
Michelle 0.11 (0.20) 1.12 0.10 (0.21) 1.10 0.08 (0.21) 0.22 0.06 (0.22) 1.06
Work-to-family (WTF) conflict ^ ^
Sometimes (outcome: 1 vs. 2 and 3) 0.07 (0.44) 1.07 0.08 (0.48) 1.08
Sometimes (outcome: 1 and 2 vs. 3) −1.27 (0.37) ** 0.28 −1.21 (0.43) ** 0.30
Often/always −0.76 (0.41) 0.47 −0.71 (0.45) 0.49
Family-to-work (FTW) conflict ^ ^
Sometimes −0.52 0.33 0.60 −0.52 (0.36) 0.59
Often/always −1.40 0.46 *** 0.25 −1.40 (0.48) ** 0.25
Job rewards 0.24 (0.04) *** 1.27 0.23 (0.04) *** 1.26
AIC 800 759 746 710

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, based on coefficient z-tests; ^p < 0.05 based on chi-square test of the overall effect; all models control for respondents’ gender, age, race, ethnicity, work from home experience, and education, along with manipulated management status; outcome 1 is neutral or dissatisfied, outcome 2 is very satisfied, outcome 3 is completely satisfied; proportional odds assumption is not violated for Models 1 and 3, and these models revert to the standard ordered logit model with robust standard errors; proportional odds assumption is violated for the sometimes category of work-to-family conflict in Models 2 and 4; n = 518.