Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 20;9:1368594. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1368594

Table 4.

Predicted family satisfaction from partial proportional odds ordered logistic regression with robust standard errors.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Coef SE OR Coef SE OR Coef SE OR Coef SE OR
Work location status
Work from home 1.12 (0.17) *** 3.00 1.09 (0.21) *** 2.98 1.52 (0.21) *** 4.56
Work from home (outcome: 1 vs. 2 and 3) 1.95 (0.23) *** 7.05
Work from home (Outcome: 1 and 2 vs. 3) 1.03 (0.28) *** 2.81
Gender
Michelle 0.27 (0.19) 1.30 0.34 (0.20) 1.40 0.24 (0.19) 1.26 0.29 (0.20) 1.34
Work-to-family (WTF) conflict ^ ^
Sometimes −1.24 (0.35) *** 0.29 −1.19 (0.37) ** 0.30
Often/always (outcome: 1 vs. 2 and 3) −2.70 (0.42) *** 0.07 −2.64 (0.44) *** 0.07
Often/always (outcome: 1 and 2 vs. 3) −0.98 (0.42) * 0.38 −1.03 (0.43) * 0.36
Family-to-work (FTW) conflict
Sometimes −0.35 (0.31) 0.70 −0.32 (0.32) 0.73
Often/always −0.84 (0.41) * 0.43 −0.80 (0.42) 0.45
Job rewards 0.13 (0.03) *** 1.14 0.13 (0.03) *** 1.14
AIC 890 820 871 804

Outcome 1 is neutral or dissatisfied, outcome 2 is very satisfied, outcome 3 is completely satisfied; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, based on coefficient z-tests; ^p < 0.05 based on chi-square test of the overall effect; all models control for respondents’ gender, age, race, ethnicity, work from home experience, and education, along with manipulated management status; proportional odds assumption violated for the often/always category of work-to-family conflict in Models 2 and 4 and for work from home in Model 4; proportional odds violated for the control variables: respondent’s race, respondent’s age and manipulated manager status in models 1 through 3; proportional odds also violated for the control variable: respondent’s ethnicity in model 2; n = 158. The italicized values under the OR column are odds ratios.