Skip to main content
. 2024;12(3):198–203. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.75672.3503

Table 1.

Measures of accuracy of GPS signs during evaluation for syndesmotic rotational malreduction models compared to reduced ‘native’ models

Approach Syndesmotic malreduction Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Anterior GPS only ERM model 87.5 12.5 50.0 50.0 50.0
Anterior GPS only IRM model 62.5 12.5 41.6 25.0 33.3
Posterior GPS only ERM model 87.5 87.5 87.5 87.5 87.5
Posterior GPS only IRM model 75.0 87.5 87.5 77.5 81.3
Anterior GPS only either ERM or IRM model 75.0 12.5 63.5 20.0 54.2
Posterior GPS only either ERM or IRM model 56.30 87.50 90.0 50.0 66.7

ERM, external rotation malreduced

IRM, internal rotation malreduced