Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;2(2):e107. doi: 10.1002/imt2.107

Table 1.

Comparative performance of Trimmomatic‐0.39, fastp 0.20.0, and fastp 0.23.2.

ID Platform File size (GB) Bases (billion) Trimmomatic‐0.39 Fastp 0.20.0 Fastp 0.23.2
S1 MGI 33.670 99.577 3:51:02 0:42:38 0:25:15
34.079
S2 Illumina 6.926 29.380 0:56:23 0:12:06 0:06:01
7.111
S3 MGI 15.659 40.448 1:39:50 0:19:10 0:10:50
13.373
S4 MGI 6.512 16.401 0:41:13 0:08:00 0:04:26
5.447
S5 Illumina 4.160 17.625 0:33:43 0:11:12 0:03:44
4.336
S6 Illumina 1.310 5.557 0:10:17 0:02:04 0:01:09
1.348
S7 MGI 2.929 7.909 0:19:57 0:03:51 0:02:09
2.752
S8 MGI 1.595 4.090 0:10:09 0:01:49 0:01:07
1.360
S9 MGI 20.200 57.615 2:21:14 0:31:39 0:15:14
18.727
S10 MGI 0.861 3.677 0:06:43 0:01:21 0:00:44
0.891
S11 Illumina 9.359 41.674 1:13:16 0:17:41 0:07:37
9.462