Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0300641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300641

Table 7. Results of the proposed methods compared to other methods from the literature on the USPS dataset.

Method Reduced (ratio) Accuracy Training Speedup Testing Speedup Reduced SVs (ratio)
Whole dataset 1.00 0.922123 1.00 1.00 1.00
CBCH (k = 400) [15] 0.63182005 0.922073 1.621575 1.025486 0.961014
BPLSH (M = 30;L = 20) [16] 0.36004663 0.921923 3.254135 1.128958 0.857655
Shell Extraction (SE) [14] 0.4 0.918934 3.209440 1.118775 0.871665
Proposed Methods DBI (r = 0.2) 0.2 0.911061 13.034276 1.785425 0.522033
BRI (r = 0.1) 0.1 0.917389 27.714068 2.379853 0.387920
BRIX (r = 0.04) 0.04 0.914898 62.172803 5.783704 0.138205
SVO (k = 3) 0.15165272 0.913154 9.330182 1.209709 0.874003
SVOX (k = 1) 0.07924839 0.916542 40.865746 4.393510 0.208468

The first row represents the metrics measured after training on the whole dataset. “Reduced (ratio)” is the ratio of the size of the resulting reduced dataset to the size of the whole dataset. “Reduced SVs (ratio)” is the ratio of the number of SVs of the reduced dataset to that of the whole dataset.