Design | Reference |
---|---|
Cochrane qualitative evidence review | Noyes J, Booth A, Cargo M, et al. Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from: Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence | Cochrane Training |
Concept analysis | Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 4th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River; 2005. |
Content analysis: content | Evans D, Fitzgerald M. Reasons for physically restraining patients and residents: a systematic review and content analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:739–743. |
Content analysis: frequencies of categories | Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Asses Res Eval. 2001;7:17. |
Critical review | Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Lib J. 2009:26,91–108. |
Evidence summary | Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, et al. Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10. |
Evidence synthesis (including 12 synthesis approaches) | Joanna Briggs Institute Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global |
Expert opinion review | McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, et al. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion. Int J Evid Based Health. 2015;13:188–195. |
Framework synthesis and ‘Best fit’ framework analysis | Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000; 320:114–116. Oliver S, Rees R, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. HEX 2008;11:72–84. Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:29. |
Integrative review | Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 52: 546–553. |
Meta-aggregation | Hannes K, Lookwood C. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta‐aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2022;67:1632–1642. |
Meta-ethnography | Noblit GW, Hare R. Meta-Ethnography: synthesising qualitative studies. London: Sage; 1988. Campbell R. Pound P, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Tech Ass. 2011;15:1–164 Available from: Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research (nihr.ac.uk) |
Meta-interpretations | Weed M. 'Meta-interpretation’: a method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. FQS. 2005;6:37. Available from: View of "Meta Interpretation": A Method for the Interpretive Synthesis of Qualitative Research | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (qualitative-research.net) |
Meta-narrative | Greenhalg T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:417–430. |
Metasynthesis | Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:365–371. |
Meta-synthesis | Fingeld DL. Meta-synthesis: the state-of-the-art so far. Qual Health Res. 2003;13:893–904. |
Meta-study | Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, et al. Meta-Study of qualitative health research. A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. |
Qualitative cross-case analysis | Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1994. |
Qualitative evidence synthesis | Noyes J, Booth A, Cargo M, et al. Chapter 21: Qualitative evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. |
Qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis | Aguirre RT, Bolton KW. Qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis in social work research: Uncharted territory. J Soc Work. 2014;14:279–294. |
Qualitative metasummary | Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for Synthesising Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007. |
Qualitative meta-synthesis | Zimmer L. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:311–318. |
Qualitative systematic review | Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for systematic review of qualitative literature in health service research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:341–351 Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Infor Lib J. 2009;26:91–108. |
Qualitative research synthesis | Savor CH, Savin-Baden M. An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. London: Routledge; 2010. |
State-of-the-art review | Grant MJ, Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Infor Lib J. 2009;26,91–108 |
Thematic synthesis | Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;10:45. |