Table 5. Sensitivity and specificity of EZtargex for the differentiation of middle or strong positivity at different cutoff values.
Cutoff Ct value | Sensitivity | 95% CI | Specificity | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
< 25.09 | 86.00 | 73.26%–94.18% | 80.00 | 67.67%–89.22% |
< 25.14 | 88.00 | 75.69%–95.47% | 80.00 | 67.67%–89.22% |
< 25.18 | 90.00 | 78.19%–96.67% | 80.00 | 67.67%–89.22% |
< 25.23 | 90.00 | 78.19%–96.67% | 78.33 | 65.80%–87.93% |
< 25.42 | 92.00 | 80.77%–97.78% | 78.33 | 65.80%–87.93% |
< 25.69 | 92.00 | 80.77%–97.78% | 76.67 | 63.96%–86.62% |
< 25.94 | 92.00 | 80.77%–97.78% | 75.00 | 62.14%–85.28% |
< 26.13 | 92.00 | 80.77%–97.78% | 71.67 | 58.56%–82.55% |
< 26.18 | 94.00 | 83.45%–98.75% | 71.67 | 58.56%–82.55% |
PCV2 viral loads determined by qPCR between 103 to 104 or above 104 DNA copies/μL were defined as middle or strong positivity. The statistical analysis was performed based on the original Ct values determined by EZtargex.
Ct, cycle threshold; CI, confidence interval; PCV2, porcine circovirus type 2; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.