Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;93(1110):20191030. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20191030

Table 4.

CT morphology comparison of different types of posterior plion fractures’ FAR1 and FAR2 (‾X ± S)

Type of posterior pilon fracture Type I (30) Type II (22) Type III (44) F p
FAR1 (%) 12.65 ± 5.94 28.98 ± 6.16 30.00 ± 12.19 34.172 0.000a
FAR2 (%) 26.28 ± 7.00 34.17 ± 3.72 34.89 ± 8.37 14.339 0.000a

FAR, fragment area ratio.

a

Means that there is statistical difference among the three groups.