Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;93(1110):20191030. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20191030

Table 6.

CT morphology comparison of different types of posterior malleolus fractures’ FAR1 and FAR2 (X ± S)

Type of posterior malleolus fracture Type I (40) Type II(38) t p
FAR1 (%) 7.80 ± 2.70 18.22 ± 8.27 −7.403 0.000a
FAR2 (%) 18.64 ± 5.30 22.98 ± 7.86 −2.846 0.006a

FAR, fragment area ratio.

a

Means that there is statistical difference between the two groups.