Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023 Apr 17;17(3):201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.03.009

Figure 3: Bland-Altman Plots of Minimal ESS by CCTA vs by IVUS for All CCTA Methods (Combined 256-slice and 64-slice methods).

Figure 3:

CCTA= coronary computed tomography angiography

IVUS=intravascular ultrasound

Each marker (N=686) corresponds to average value over 0.3 mm thick sub segment

Mean difference: Combined 256+64 slice CCTA: −0.50 Pa (CI −0.696 to −0.303)

256-slice CCTA: −0.23 Pa (CI −0.440 to −0.028)

64-slice CCTA: −0.75 Pa (CI −1.080 to −0.422)