Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023 Apr 17;17(3):201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.03.009

Figure 4: Bland-Altman Plots of Maximal ESS by CCTA vs by IVUS for All CCTA Methods (Combined 256-slice method and 64-slice methods).

Figure 4:

CCTA= coronary computed tomography angiography

IVUS=intravascular ultrasound

Each marker (N=686) corresponds to average value over ~0.3 mm thick sub segment

Mean difference: Combined 256+64-slice CCTA: −0.85 Pa (CI −1.094 to −0.601)

256-slice CCTA: −0.52 Pa (CI −0.759 to −0.288)

64-slice CCTA: −1.15 Pa (CI −1.579 to −0.731)