Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023 Apr 17;17(3):201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.03.009

Figure 5: Bland-Altman Plots of Average ESS by CCTA vs by IVUS for All CCTA methods (Combined 256- slice method and 64-slice method).

Figure 5:

CCTA=coronary computed tomography angiography, IVUS=intravsacular ultrasound

Each marker (N=686) corresponds to average value over ~0.3 mm thick sub segment

Mean difference: Combined 256+64 slice CCTA: −0.67 Pa (CI −0.885 to −0.453)

256-slice CCTA: −0.37 Pa (CI −0.586 to −0.158)

64-slice CCTA: −0.95 Pa (CI −1.317 to −0.583)