Table 5. Comparing the effectiveness in time taken for two NiTi files and hand files for removing gutta-percha and resin-based sealer from palatal root canals (T2-T1).
The data was are summarized as the mean ± SD (standard deviation
| Variables | N | Mean | Standard. deviation | 95% confidence interval for mean | Minimum | Maximum | P -value |
| T1 | Group I: Neo-Endo | 20 | 3.284 | 1.229 | 0.275 | 2.708 | 3.859 |
| Group II: R-Endo | 20 | 4.515 | 3.132 | 0.7 | 3.049 | 5.98 | |
| Group III: K and H files | 20 | 7.016 | 2.826 | 0.632 | 5.693 | 8.338 | |
| T2 | Group I: Neo-Endo | 20 | 8.171 | 2.691 | 0.602 | 6.911 | 9.43 |
| Group II: R-Endo | 20 | 16.988 | 8.264 | 1.848 | 13.12 | 20.856 | |
| Group III: K and H files | 20 | 23.193 | 8.629 | 1.929 | 19.154 | 27.231 | |
| T1+T2 | Group I: Neo-Endo | 20 | 11.454 | 3.307 | 0.739 | 9.906 | 13.002 |
| Group II: R-Endo | 20 | 21.503 | 8.519 | 1.905 | 17.515 | 25.49 | |
| Group III: K and H files | 20 | 30.208 | 8.63 | 1.93 | 26.169 | 34.247 |