Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;16(3):e55551. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55551

Table 5. Comparing the effectiveness in time taken for two NiTi files and hand files for removing gutta-percha and resin-based sealer from palatal root canals (T2-T1).

The data was are summarized as the mean ± SD (standard deviation

 

Variables N Mean Standard. deviation 95% confidence interval for mean Minimum Maximum P -value
T1 Group I: Neo-Endo 20 3.284 1.229 0.275 2.708 3.859
Group II: R-Endo 20 4.515 3.132 0.7 3.049 5.98
Group III: K and H files 20 7.016 2.826 0.632 5.693 8.338
T2 Group I: Neo-Endo 20 8.171 2.691 0.602 6.911 9.43
Group II: R-Endo 20 16.988 8.264 1.848 13.12 20.856
Group III: K and H files 20 23.193 8.629 1.929 19.154 27.231
T1+T2 Group I: Neo-Endo 20 11.454 3.307 0.739 9.906 13.002
Group II: R-Endo 20 21.503 8.519 1.905 17.515 25.49
Group III: K and H files 20 30.208 8.63 1.93 26.169 34.247