TABLE 3. Linear regression models and pairwise comparisons of perceived healthfulness of a sweetened fruit drink among Mexican and Chilean youth. International Food Policy Study 2019.
|
|
Chile |
Mexico |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
β |
95% CI |
β |
95% CI |
|
|
Front-of-package label condition | ||||
|
Control group |
Ref. |
Ref. |
||
|
HSR vs Control (ref) |
-0.17 |
-0.36,0.02 |
0.04 |
-0.14,0.22 |
|
WL vs Control (ref) |
-0.76 |
-0.95,-0.58 |
-0.67 |
-0.85,-0.49 |
|
GDA vs Control (ref) |
-0.12 |
-0.32,0.07 |
-0.07 |
-0.25,0.11 |
|
MTL vs Control (ref) |
-0.48 |
-0.67,-0.29 |
-0.19 |
-0.37,-0.01 |
|
NS vs Control (ref) |
-0.16 |
-0.35,0.02 |
0.09 |
-0.08,0.27 |
|
Pairwise comparisons | ||||
|
WL vs HSR (ref) |
-0.6 |
-0.79,-0.40 |
-0.71 |
-0.89,-0.52 |
|
GDA vs HSR (ref) |
0.04 |
-0.16,0.25 |
-0.11 |
-0.29.0.72 |
|
MTL vs HSR (ref) |
-0.31 |
-0.50,-0.11 |
-0.22 |
-0.41,-0.04 |
|
NS vs HSR (ref) |
0 |
-0.19,0.20 |
0.06 |
-0.12,0.24 |
|
GDA vs WL (ref) |
0.64 |
0.45,0.83 |
0.6 |
0.42,0.78 |
|
MTL vs WL (ref) |
0.29 |
0.10,0.48 |
0.48 |
0.30,0.66 |
|
NS vs WL (ref) |
0.6 |
0.41,0.79 |
0.76 |
0.58,0.94 |
|
MTL vs GDA (ref) |
-0.35 |
-0.55,-0.16 |
-0.11 |
-0.29,0.07 |
|
NS vs GDA (ref) |
-0.04 |
-0.24,0.16 |
0.17 |
-0.01,0.34 |
|
NS vs MTL (ref) |
0.31 |
0.12,0.50 |
0.28 |
0.10,0.46 |
Linear regression models introduced ratings of perceived healthfulness (from 1 or very unhealthy to 5 or very healthy) as a continuous variable and controlled for age, sex, indigeneity, nutrition knowledge, and income adequacy. Bold font indicates statistically significant (p<0.05) differences with the reference group.
HSR, Health Star Rating; WL, Warning Label; GDA, Guideline Daily Amount; MTL, Multiple Traffic Light; NS, Nutri-Score; Ref., reference category.