Table 3.
Comparisons of area under the curves among the quantitative-semantic model, radiomic models, and frozen section model in the primary and validation cohorts
| Pairwise comparison | Primary cohort | Validation cohort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z | P | Z | P | |
| Quantitative-semantic model vs Radiomic model of low-dose CT | 1.535 | 0.125 | 0.944 | 0.345 |
| Quantitative-semantic model vs Radiomic model of standard-dose CT | 1.748 | 0.081 | 0.080 | 0.936 |
| Quantitative-semantic model vs FS model | 0.085 | 0.932 | 0.839 | 0.402 |
| Radiomic model of low-dose CT vs Radiomic model of standard-dose CT | 0.543 | 0.587 | 0.936 | 0.350 |
| Radiomic model of low-dose CT vs FS model | 1.191 | 0.234 | 1.618 | 0.106 |
| Radiomic model of standard-dose CT vs FS model | 1.723 | 0.085 | 0.983 | 0.326 |
FS, frozen section.