Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;95(1133):20210380. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210380

Table 4.

Subjective image analysis results with ASIR-V and DLIR under different radiation doses

Variables SDCT LDCT DLIR-M DLIR-H P
P SDCT vs DLIR-H SDCT vs DLIR-M SDCT vs LDCT DLIR-H vs DL-M DLIR-H vs LDCT DLIR-M vs LDCT
Solid nodule 4.20 ± 0.40 2.72 ± 0.62 3.31 ± 0.73 4.08 ± 0.49 <0.001 0.43 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Ground-glass nodule 3.70 ± 0.47 2.10 ± 0.31 2.33 ± 0.48 3.47 ± 0.82 <0.001 0.34 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.16
Mediastinal tissue 4.12 ± 0.33 2.04 ± 0.20 3.02 ± 0.44 3.85 ± 0.41 <0.001 <0.005 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

ASIR, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; DLIR, deep learning image reconstruction; LDCT, low-dose CT; SD, standard deviation; SDCT, standard-dose CT.

Data are presented as mean ± SD. p < 0.05; SDCT: ASIR-V40% with standard-dose; LDCT: ASIR-V40% with low-dose; DLIR-M: DLIR-M with low-dose; DLIR-H: DLIR-H with low-dose.