Table 4.
Subjective image analysis results with ASIR-V and DLIR under different radiation doses
| Variables | SDCT | LDCT | DLIR-M | DLIR-H | P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | SDCT vs DLIR-H | SDCT vs DLIR-M | SDCT vs LDCT | DLIR-H vs DL-M | DLIR-H vs LDCT | DLIR-M vs LDCT | |||||
| Solid nodule | 4.20 ± 0.40 | 2.72 ± 0.62 | 3.31 ± 0.73 | 4.08 ± 0.49 | <0.001 | 0.43 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Ground-glass nodule | 3.70 ± 0.47 | 2.10 ± 0.31 | 2.33 ± 0.48 | 3.47 ± 0.82 | <0.001 | 0.34 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.16 |
| Mediastinal tissue | 4.12 ± 0.33 | 2.04 ± 0.20 | 3.02 ± 0.44 | 3.85 ± 0.41 | <0.001 | <0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
ASIR, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; DLIR, deep learning image reconstruction; LDCT, low-dose CT; SD, standard deviation; SDCT, standard-dose CT.
Data are presented as mean ± SD. p < 0.05; SDCT: ASIR-V40% with standard-dose; LDCT: ASIR-V40% with low-dose; DLIR-M: DLIR-M with low-dose; DLIR-H: DLIR-H with low-dose.