Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 5;1(4):233–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.08.006

Table 3.

Summary of the Comparison of Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Values in Major Depressive Disorder as Compared to Healthy Controls (HC) Participants

UNC- L UNC-R UNC-B CGC-L CGC-R CGC-B CGH-L CGH-R CGH-B ATR-L ATR-R ATR-B ACR-L ACR-R ACR-B IC-L IC-R ALIC-B IFO-L IFO-R IFO-B
Lee et al. (2021)29
Wu et al. (2020)18 -
van Velzen et al. (2020)22 - - - - - -
Cullen et al. (2020)30 (u) - (u) ↑(u) - - - -
Geng et al. (2016)34
LeWinn et al. (2014)17 - -
Aghajani et al. (2014)35
Henderson et al. (2013)21 ↓ (u) (u)
Bessette et al. (2014)19
Cullen et al. (2010)20 (u) (u) (u) (u) (u)
Wu et al. (2022)36
Total Number 6 3 4 3 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 4
SLF-L SLF-R SLF-B ILF-L ILF-R ILF-B CST-L CST-R CST-B SCR-L SCR-R SCR-B Fornix-B GCC BCC SCC EC-L EC-R PTR-L PTR-R PTR-B
Lee et al. (2021)29
Wu et al. (2020)18
van Velzen et al. (2020)22 - - - - (u) -
Cullen et al. (2020)30 - - - - - -
Geng et al. (2016)34
LeWinn et al. (2014)17
Aghajani et al. (2014)35
Henderson et al. (2013)21
Bessette et al. (2014)19
Cullen et al. (2010)20 (u)
Wu et al. (2022)36
Total Number 1 1 2 2 1 3 5 2 2 1

Note: ACR = anterior corona radiata; ALIC = anterior limb of the internal capsule; ATR = anterior thalamic radiation; BCC = body of the corpus callosum; CGC = cingulate (dorsal portion); CGH = cingulate (ventral portion); CST = corticospinal tract; EC = external capsule; GCC = genu of the corpus callosum; IC = internal capsule; IFO = inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF = inferior longitudinal fasciculus; SCR = superior corona radiata; SLF = superior longitudinal fasciculus; PTR = posterior thalamic radiation; SCC = splenium of the corpus callosum; UNC = uncinate fasciculus. Indicates that decreased FA was found in MDD as compared to HC; Indicates that increased FA was found in MDD as compared to HC. “-” Indicates that no significant difference was found between the MDD and HC groups and specific results for each tract/region were listed in the corresponding paper. “u” Indicates significant p value (uncorrected); p value was not significant after correction for multiple comparisons

Please note that 3 papers31, 32, 33 used methods or reported results that were not conducive to being summarized in the format of Table 3, and are therefore summarized separately in Table S1, available online.