Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;4(4):e0003040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003040

Table 3. Work experience and challenges in rural facility during posting faced by the respondents who served rural posting uninterruptedly.

Experience in a rural facility served rural posting uninterruptedly Didn’t serve rural posting uninterruptedly P valuea
% (n) % (n)
Workload in rural facility
 Manageable 66.9 (103) 33.1 (51) 0.004*
 Not manageable 81.6 (115) 18.4 (26)
Private practice during rural posting
 No 75.4 (159) 24.6 (26) 0.442
 Yes 71.1 (64) 28.9 (52)
Lived in the residence provided by the health facility
 No 78.3 (108) 21.7 (30) 0.145
 Yes 70.9 (117) 29.1 (48)
Challenges in rural facility
Felt physically unsafe environment
 No 77.8 (70) 22.2 (20) 0.362
 Yes 72.8 (155) 27.2 (58)
Experienced physically abusive behaviour
 No 73.8 (191) 26.2 (68) 0.621
 Yes 77.3 (34) 22.7 (10)
Experienced verbally abusive behaviour
 No 68.6 (70) 31.4 (32) 0.110
 Yes 77.1 (155) 22.9 (46)
Staffs were absent in working hours
 No 71.3 (112) 28.7 (45) 0.228
 Yes 77.4 (113) 22.6 (33)
Seek help from family if you faced any problem locally
 No 76.1 (140) 23.9 (44) 0.365
 Yes 71.4 (85) 28.6 (34)
Seek help from friends if you faced any problems locally
 No 75.7 (156) 24.3 (50) 0.393
 Yes 71.1 (69) 28.9 (28)
Seek help from social links if you faced any problems locally
 No 75.9 (151) 24.1 (48) 0.372
 Yes 71.2 (74) 28.8 (30)
Seek help from influential people in the local community if you faced any problem locally
 No 68.3 (127) 31.7 (59) 0.003*
 Yes 83.8 (98) 16.2 (19)
Doctor shortage in last rural posting
 Yes 73.5 (166) 26.5 (60) 0.662
 No 76.0 (57) 24.0 (18)
If yes, then the reason for the doctor shortage in the last rural facility (multiple responses)
 Doctors not posted in sanctioned post 76.6 (108) 23.4 (33) 0.385
 Doctor left the post to join post-graduation 72.3 (73) 27.7 (28) 0.577
 Doctors absent without official reason 94.4 (17) 5.6 (1) 0.050

aP values are obtained from the chi-square test.

* Significant at a 5% level of significance.