Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 5;103(14):e37589. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037589

Table 3.

Comparison of joint swelling improvement scores between 2 groups of patients (person) M(P25, P75).

Control group (n = 101) Experimental group—high concentration alkaline water (n = 100) Experimental group—medium concentration alkaline water (n = 100) Experimental group – low concentration alkaline water (n = 96)
H

P
Before treatment 2.47 (1.94, 3.08) 1.35 (1.11, 1.73) 2.12 (1.76, 2.46) 2.34 (1.85, 2.68) 142.86 .91
3 mo after treatment 2.34 (1.89, 2.81) 1.43 (1.09, 1.68) 1.96 (1.59, 2.25) 2.39 (1.88, 2.73) 161.90 7.12 × 10−35
6 mo after treatment 2.38 (1.98, 2.82) 1.50 (1.16, 1.88) 2.08 (1.67, 2.38) 2.27 (1.83, 2.70) 112.26 3.58 × 10−24
12 mo after treatment 2.67 (2.14, 3.03) 1.51 (1.10, 1.82) 2.01 (1.64, 2.41) 2.29 (1.89, 2.80) 131.25 2.90 × 10−28

Non-normal distribution data that do not conform to the normal distribution are described using the median (interquartile spacing) (M (P25, P75)) and independent sample Kruskal-Wallis H test. Perform inter-group comparisons for parameters with statistically significant differences.