Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 5;103(14):e37589. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037589

Table 4.

Comparison of joint range of motion scores between 2 groups of patients (person) M(P25, P75).

Control group (n = 101) Experimental group—high concentration alkaline water (n = 100) Experimental group—medium concentration alkaline water (n = 100) Experimental group—low concentration alkaline water (n = 96)
H

P
Before treatment 2.47 (1.94, 3.08) 2.34 (1.88, 2.67) 2.31 (1.85, 2.65) 2.33 (1.86, 2.68) 66.31 2.63 × 10−14
3 mo after treatment 2.34 (1.89, 2.81) 2.39 (1.88, 2.73) 1.96 (1.59, 2.25) 1.43 (1.09, 1.68) 317.88 1.34 × 10−68
6 mo after treatment 2.38 (1.98, 2.82) 2.27 (1.83, 2.70) 2.08 (1.67, 2.38) 1.50 (1.16, 1.88) 292.35 4.50 × 10−63
12 mo after treatment 2.67 (2.14, 3.03) 2.29 (1.89, 2.80) 2.01 (1.64, 2.41) 1.51 (1.10, 1.82) 337.85 6.38 × 10−73

Non-normal distribution data that do not conform to a normal distribution are described using median (interquartile range) (M (P25, P75)) and independent sample Kruskal-Wallis H test. Compare between groups for parameters with statistically significant differences.