Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 5;103(14):e37686. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037686

Table 2.

Comparisons of ipsilesional parietofrontal network connectivity between the two groups (n = 44).

Group Before During After F P
Alpha EA Group 0.53 (0.47, 0.57) 0.50 (0.44, 0.55) 0.53 (0.47, 0.59) 5.05 .011*
SEA Group 0.51 (0.46, 0.60) 0.53 (0.47, 0.58) 0.53 (0.46, 0.58) 0.203 .817
Mean difference (95% CI)
−0.04 (−0.07 to 0.00) 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.04)
Z/t −0.338 −1.998 0.353
P .735 .049* .725
Beta EA Group 0.48 (0.42, 0.51) 0.44 (0.39, 0.52) 0.48 (0.41, 0.54) 3.295 .047*
SEA Group 0.44 (0.40, 0.55) 0.45 (0.43, 0.54) 0.48 (0.40, 0.53) 1.027 .367
Mean difference (95% CI)
−0.04 (−0.08 to −0.01) 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05)
Z/t −0.128 −2.342 0.681
P .898 .022* .498

Data described as median (P25, P75).

CI = confidence interval.

*

P < .05.