Abstract
The growing interest of the scientific community in the study of probiotics has gathered valuable data about its beneficial effects for multiple clinical conditions. This data also provides evidence for the functions and properties of probiotics and how they contribute to health benefits by influencing normal microbiota. Lactobacillus is an important genus which has long been utilized in the food industry and is also found as normal oral, intestinal and vaginal microbiota. Lactobacillus has shown multiple health benefits but its relative importance as a probiotic is majorly explored for gastrointestinal health. Healthy vaginal microbiota typically harbors Lactobacillus spp. providing several health benefits for female reproductive health, but there is more data required in order to compare the relative benefits with probiotic Lactobacillus added through either natural food sources or with standard probiotics supplements. The present article discusses the current status of knowledge about vaginal Lactobacillus as a probiotic and also compares the potential of probiotics from natural sources and through supplements along with recent approaches in this area.
Keywords: Lactobacillus, probiotics, vaginitis, supplements, probiotic food
Introduction
As per the Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization, probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host” [1]. These organisms have several beneficial potentials giving them high recognition as human and animal nutritional supplements [2], such as antioxidant and anticancer activity, cholesterol reducing activity, anti-pathogenic, with beneficial microbiota management effects [2,3], for all age groups including infants [4].
Ample studies have investigated diverse potential of probiotics in human health, however the majority of these are focused on gastrointestinal health. As gastrointestinal health affects whole body physiology, it is understood that these probiotics can exert their beneficial effects towards several other extra-gastrointestinal diseases [5].
The role of probiotics in vaginal health is an important domain highlighting their role in extra-intestinal benefits [6]. The vaginal microbiome is an important component regulating human vaginal health and Lactobacillus spp. are a major contributor to a healthy vaginal microflora [7]. Lactobacillus spp. play major roles in vaginal and reproductive health including prevention of pathogens through production of antimicrobial compounds and metabolites [8]. Notwithstanding, the vaginal microbiota is affected by several factors including, sexual practices, menstruation, pregnancy, antibiotics application, and vaginal douching thereby affecting vaginal health [9]. The depletion of Lactobacillus spp. in vaginal microflora along with overgrowth of non-Lactobacillus bacteria often linked with several diseases, such as bacterial vaginosis and sexually transmitted infections [6,10].
Due to the important role of Lactobacillus in vaginal and female reproductive health, sometimes these bacteria may need to be supplemented in order to correct vaginal microbiota dysbiosis. However, the establishment of supplemented strains over other strains provided through natural sources is comparatively different. In addition, recent studies are trying to understand beneficial effects by natural vs supplemented Lactobacillus strains for vaginal health. The present article tries to gather information about the application of Lactobacillus as probiotics for vaginal health and also covers recent approaches to understand the effects of these probiotic strains on human health including effects on vaginal and female reproductive health.
Vaginal microbiota and the role of Lactobacillus
Vaginal microbiota display peculiar colonization pattern for each female, however the Lactobacillus genera make a major contributor for healthy vaginal microbiota [11]. Studies have linked the presence of Lactobacillus in the endometrial microbiome with early pregnancy, implantation failure or early spontaneous abortion [12]. Despite technological advancements and growing interest of the scientific community in understanding vaginal microbiota, healthy composition is not completely understood due to its complex community structure and dynamics despite its critical role in female reproductive health [13]. Vaginal Lactobacilli are an important microbiota component playing multiple roles, including vaginal innate immunity, production of lactic acid leading to low vaginal pH (between 4.0-4.5) inhibiting several pathogens, productions of bacteriocins and checking vaginal inflammation. The vaginal microbiota is subjected to changes with different stages of life i.e. infant, puberty, pregnancy and menopause [14]. In addition, temporal variations in vaginal microbiota are attributed to hormonal changes, antibiotics use, menstruation and vaginal douching [15,16].
Vaginal microbiota shows different composition among ethnic groups and is defined as community state type (CST). The type of vaginal microbiota is clustered into five CSTs referred as I, II, III, IV, V; on the basis of the relative abundance of four Lactobacillus spp. i.e. L. iners, L. gasseri, L. crispatus, and L. jensenii along with heterogenous group of microbes. L. crispatus dominates CST I, L. gasseri by CST II, L. iners and L. jensenii by CST III and V respectively, while CST IV is considered as dysbiotic state where multiple obligate and facultative anaerobes (such as Bifidobacterium, Gardnerella, Prevotella, Aerococcus, Atopobium, Anaerococcus, Dialister, Eggerthella, Finegoldia, Gemella, Parvimonas, Peptoniphilus, Peptostreptococcus, Megasphaera, Sneathia, Veillonella, and Corynebacterium with some rare taxa) dominates the microbiome with deficiency of Lactobacillus [17,18]. Some additional CST types have recently been identified after classification of existing CST type IV into subtypes as CST IV-A, CST IV-B, and CST IV-C along with CST VI and CST VII containing dominant Gardnerella vaginalis and Prevotella, respectively, type VIII resemble aerobic vaginitis, and type IX predominantly having genera other than Lactobacillus, Gardnella or Prevotella [18]. Some studies related to Lactobacillus spp. that have been found in healthy vaginal microbiota are represented in Table 1 in order to provide overview about different vaginal Lactobacillus strains.
Table 1.
Some representative studies specific to Lactobacillus strain found in healthy vaginal microbiota
Lactobacillus strains observed in healthy vaginal microbiota | Age of participants | Reference |
---|---|---|
L. reuteri (32.5%), L. fermentum (25%), and L. salivarius (16.25%) | 18-45 yrs | [19] |
L. crispatus (39.6%), L. gasseri (45.8%), and L. jensenii (14.6%) | 18-45 yrs | [20] |
L. mucosae (16.2%), L. fermentum (6.4%), L. gasseri (3.9%), L. brevis (3.2%), L helveticus (2%), L. jensenii (2%), L. ingluviei (1.3%), L. reuteri (1.3%), L. gallinarum (0.6%) and L. parafarraginis (0.6%) | 18-35 yrs | [21] |
L. crispatus (26.2%), L. gasseri (31%), L. jensenii (11.9%), L. vaginalis (9.5%), L. mucosae (2.4%), L. reuteri (2.4%), L. fermentum (2.4%), L. oris (2.4%) and L. delbrueckii (2.4%) (Found in HIV negative subjects during the study on HIV positive and negative women) | 33-39 yrs | [22,23] |
L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii | 18-40 yrs | [24] |
L. helveticus, L. iners and L. gasseri | 19-35 yrs | [25] |
57 Lactobacillus strains were purified including L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri, L. mucosae, and L. vaginalis | 16-22 yrs | [26] |
L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners (were detected to check effects of vaginal washing on Lactobacillus) | --- | [27] |
Due to highly complex and diverse composition of vaginal microbiota and the important roles played by Lactobacillus in normal physiology and status, it is important to understand the influence of Lactobacillus on the function in vaginal microbiota. Table 2 lists some of the studies indicating roles of different vaginal microbiota Lactobacillus spp. under different conditions. These studies indicate that Lactobacillus plays a major role in shaping the structure of vaginal microbiota as indicated by different CSTs. These CSTs indicate towards specific microbiota-host interactions and their impact on host health which deserve critical appraisal for understanding probiotic potential of Lactobacillus. In addition to the role of CST in vaginal microbiota-host interactions, host physiology also greatly affects Lactobacillus species in vaginal microbiota. The complexity of vaginal microbiota as evident through CSTs indicates the requirement of advanced tools and approaches to understand exact effect of vaginal microbiota on human health. This will also help to harness the true potential of this knowledge and therefore in the next section we will try to give a brief overview about recent approaches in this area.
Table 2.
Role of Vaginal Lactobacillus in different clinical conditions and maintenance of normal physiological response
Lactobacillus spp. | Activity | Reference |
---|---|---|
L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri | Cell free supernatant of Lactobacillus spp. showed inhibition of proliferation of cervical cancer using Caski cell lines and showed pH independent morphological changes. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 oncogenes, along with CDK2 and cyclin A were reduced, while p21 expression was increased. This inhibitory effects on cervical cancer cells are mediated by HPV oncogenes and cell cycle-related genes regulation. | [28] |
L. crispatus | L. crispatus inhibited entry of Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 in the cell by trapping virus particles on cell lines based assays. | [29] |
L. acidophilus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii | Lactobacillus spp. isolated from vaginas of healthy women self aggregated, adhered to vaginal epithelia and displaced vaginal pathogens, such as G. vaginalis. The self aggregation was mediated through proteins in L. gasseri and lipoproteins in L. acidophilus and L. jensenii. The competition for vaginal cells glycolipid receptors between Lactobacillus and pathogenic bacteria was proposed as a target for this activity. | [30] |
L. crispatus | Lactobacillus was co-cultured with vaginal epithelial cell lines (MS74) and evaluated for their activity on vaginal epithelial healing using scratch assay. The bacteria significantly improved re-epithelialization of MS74 cells with increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). | [31] |
L. iners, L. crispatus | 3D human vaginal epithelial cells were colonized with studied Lactobacillus or Atopobium vaginae and Prevotella bivia (associated with bacterial vaginosis) and different group of bacteria act differentially in modulating innate immune response and barrier function. | [32] |
L. crispatus, L. iners, L. gasseri, L. jensenii | Level of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-8) was evaluated in vaginal secretions and compared with vaginal bacterial communities and found that vaginal microbial communities affect these parameters. | [33] |
L. crispatus, L. iners | Dominance of studied L. crispatus in vaginal microenvironment of pregnant women shows lower induction of stress related proteins HSP70. | [34] |
L. crispatus, L. iners | The relative concentrations of L. crispatus, L. iners and G. vaginalis decide the vaginal microbiota composition of mid-trimester pregnant women. | [35] |
Probiotic Lactobacillus: natural and supplemented strains
Several bacterial genera are used in probiotic preparations, including; Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Streptococcus and Bacillus. Along with this, certain fungal strains such as Sacchromyces are also used for probiotic application [36]. Though probiotic bacteria are generally a component of healthy microbiota and confers normal health status, their reduction/absence under disease conditions needs their administration into dysbiotic microbiota in order to provide health benefits. However, the efficacy of probiotics depends on species, dose, clinical disease and duration of application [37] and therefore sometimes it is required to add certain specific probiotic strains to provide health benefits. There are two major ways to incorporate probiotics for health benefits. The probiotics naturally present in certain food products or certain medicinal formulations can be used as probiotic supplements in order to provide benefits in dysbiotic microbiota. Lactobacillus spp. are naturally present in several fermented food products. Such as Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus which are present in yoghurt [38]. Sauerkraut is a product of cabbage fermented by lactic acid bacteria and contains a large proportion of Lactobacillus spp. [39]. Kimchi is a popular fermented food of Korea containing high level of lactic acid bacteria such as, Lactobacillus plantarum [40]. Soymilk, Kefir and several other food products provides Lactobacillus as natural probiotic bacteria [41,42]. In addition, several Lactobacillus supplements are also available in markets for health benefits.
The choice of probiotics from natural sources vs. probiotics supplements depends on a number of factors. The probiotic food can offer multiple beneficial bacteria and thus may provide broader health benefits over supplemented strains having a specific type of bacteria. In addition, probiotics taken from food may allow greater chance to interact with digestive tract naturally as they need to compete with existing microbiota for nutrients and adhesion - due to colonization resistance [43], and therefore food probiotics are considered to provide better optimization for colonization and subsequent beneficial effects. In contrast, the efficacy of probiotics in food will depend on several factors, such as processing, storage and individual variations in food components. Therefore, probiotic supplements can provide standardized and consistent doses of specific strains in order to ensure reliable and predictable outcomes.
The recent concept of synbiotics integrates probiotics with the nutritional requirements for their growth and survival. These nonviable food components confer health benefits to the host due to promoting healthy microbiota is termed as prebiotics and the combination of synergistically acting probiotics-prebiotics is known as synbiotics [44]. Each type of probiotic formulation has their unique advantage and disadvantages and is a topic of discussion among researchers.
Recent approaches for evaluation of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus
Considering the important role of vaginal Lactobacillus in maintaining healthy status, it is important to evaluate their probiotic potential for particular clinical conditions in order to develop and identify an effective probiotic strain. Figure 1 represents the role of Lactobacillus as probiotics along with their sources. It is proposed that the vaginal ecosystem embodies several probiotic strains which can be used for the development of functional probiotic formulations [45].
Figure 1.
Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus for female reproductive health and approaches for identification and evaluation of their beneficial potential.
Microorganisms should qualify certain criteria to be a useful probiotic along with their demonstrated beneficial effects. These include their non-pathogenic and non-toxic nature, free from any side effects, able to survive in the body, present in sufficient numbers to provide health benefits, and compatibility with formulation components, storage and processing conditions [46]. The evaluation of each aspect requires separate set of assays to understand the probiotic potential of any microorganism. Evaluation of safety with probiotic strains is highly important after their cultivation. Assessment of safety profile involves several tests, such as evaluation of infectivity and in situ toxin production, presence of ability to transfer antibiotic resistance genes, any potential harmful metabolic activity along with immunological effects [47]. These assessments are important to ensure safety profile of a probiotics. For instance, a recent study has evaluated haemolytic activity, bile salt hydrolase activity, and antibiotic susceptibility to assess safety profile of Lactobacillus probiotics. In addition, the ability to resist low pH, bile and lysozyme, antagonistic property for pathogens, ability to auto/co-aggregate, production of hydrogen peroxide, biofilm formation, and adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells were considered for probiotic functional property of Lactobacillus [45].
Recent technological advancements enabled a deeper understanding of the mechanisms, effects, and applications of probiotics. The use of omics technologies, advancement in formulation development with innovative research approaches has promised the way for significant progress in probiotic study. The integration of multi-omics, high throughput approaches with animal and human studies are providing additional insights about effects of probiotics [48]. Systems biology is also providing valuable information about basic biology and the probiotic potential of vaginal Lactobacillus [49]. Therefore, the development of multi-omics technologies along with systems biology approaches and integration of biological assays for evaluation of functional and safety profile of probiotics is paving the way for identification of efficient probiotic strains for multiple applications including vaginal probiotics.
Challenges associated with the development of Lactobacillus as probiotics
Despite several technological advancements and improved understanding of probiotic potential of Lactobacillus, their development as an effective agent faces several challenges. The efficacy of probiotic Lactobacillus is either strain/or disease specific. For instance, the anti-Candida effects of vaginal Lactobacilli is evident, however, some Lactobacillus strains such as L. crispatus BC2, L. gasseri BC10 and L. gasseri BC11 act as most active strains for this activity. In addition, this activity is not found against all Candida strains, such as C. krusei and C. parapsilosis [50]. Moreover, age, probiotic strain, species, duration and dosage of intervention along with the form of administration also affect the efficacy of probiotics [51]. Along with probiotic and host associated efficacy variations, colonization of supplemented probiotic strains faces several challenges due to the complex structure of gut and vaginal microbiota. A probiotic organism receives the first challenge from existing microbial population, as they compete for nutrients and colonization sites and therefore, colonization of any probiotic strain defines its ability to influence its efficacy. The colonization of probiotics is influenced by several factors, such as local microbiota composition, ability of supplemented strain to withstand effects of acid, bile salts, enzymes, host immunity etc. [52-54]. In addition, genetic determinants of probiotic stains including specific genes and mechanisms involved in adhesion, biofilm formation, and mucosal interaction which also contribute to the successful colonization of probiotic strains [55].
Several approaches have been tried to improve the probiotic potential of supplemented strains. For example, microencapsulation leads to valuable effects on increasing cell viability during storage and needs investigation to understand their impact on probiotics health benefits [56]. Table 3 presents approaches utilized for production of commercial formulations of probiotics. Considering the status of supplemented strains in colonizing the host and showing health benefits, the probiotics taken with fermented food have shown their ability to transiently alter intestinal microbiota composition. The use of certain species in fermented food may increase the colonization. It is noteworthy that, some probiotic foods are available only in some countries therefore, their use and efficacy may differ as per the location, food habits, living style and environment etc. [57].
Table 3.
Different techniques and methods used for preparation of probiotic Lactobacillus formulations
Lactobacillus Formulation | Method | Reference |
---|---|---|
Lactobacillus acidophilus | Encapsulation of L. acidophilus alginate (Al) and alginate-chitosan (Al/Chi) through extrusion method to improve survival in intestine and freeze drying. | [58] |
Lactobacillus plantarum 299v | Lyophilization has benefit to probiotics from harsh conditions. Microencapsulation was done to protect the probiotics by coating them. | [59] |
Lactobacillus reuteri | Coacervation was used for probiotic microcapsules with benefits in terms of protective capabilities and viability. | [60] |
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) | Encapsulation of L. rhamnosus GG strain in alginate systems was performed through ionotropic gelation technology. It is a method in which polyelectrolytes react with oppositely charged molecules which are subjected to sol-gel transition resulting in the formation of structured physical materials. | [61] |
Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 | Bacteria were microencapsulated to reduce the inhibition, and increased viability of the microencapsulated cultures. Bacterial damage during the microencapsulation by the emulsion method was indicated as low. | [62] |
Lactobacillus sporogenes | Microencapsulation of probiotics using alginate beads has proven to improve viability of probiotic bacteria in gastric conditions. | [63] |
Lactobacillus brevis | L. brevis loaded in buccal films by means of a modified casting-solvent evaporation method was able to deliver Lactobacilli inside the buccal cavity. This process involves the evaporation of a solvent from a starting solution and the subsequent formation of a polymeric membrane. | [64] |
The route of administration of probiotics for benefits in vaginal health is also a challenge. Recent clinical trials demonstrated that vaginal colonization of Lactobacilli is low after oral administration of L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 [65]. In addition, microbiota composition and physical conditions significantly influence probiotic colonization and persistence of supplemented strains [44]. For instance, sexually active women show less chances of colonization of supplemented probiotic strains [53]. Moreover, long term use of antibiotics, hormonal changes, glycogen content, and vaginal pH can also influence colonization and efficacy of supplemented probiotic strains [66]. These challenges need careful consideration before designing probiotics for female reproductive health applications.
Potential of probiotics from natural sources and supplements
Lactobacillus strains supplemented through natural sources has gained significant attention due to their diverse health promoting properties. However, using Lactobacillus from natural sources vs. supplements present both challenges and opportunities. Meeting the growing demand of probiotics from natural sources requires proper availability of prebiotics, cost effective production of probiotics, and maintenance of viability and storage of functional food containing probiotics during manufacturing and supply [67]. In addition to production, the commercialization, regulatory approval and guidelines to use natural Lactobacillus strains as probiotics require rigorous scientific and regulatory support [68]. Therefore, probiotic manufacturers need to ensure proper efforts with regulatory bodies to ensure safety, efficacy, and quality control of natural Lactobacillus-based probiotic products. The use of Lactobacillus as supplement in vaginal suppositories is also investigated for recurrent urinary tract infection with positive effects; however, more focused study on Lactobacillus strain, dosing is required to assess the actual potential [69].
These regulatory considerations also involve safety of natural Lactobacillus as there are some studies that have reported Lactobacillus-associated infections. Bacteremia due to Lactobacillus is rare but is found in immunocompromised patients, and it must be evaluated for avoiding potential risk. Studies reported that L. rhamnosus GG, L. plantarum, and L. paracasei were involved in bacteremia with certain other bacteria [70], especially among immunocompromised patients. In addition, probiotic organisms are also known for causing systemic infections, metabolic disturbances, and may induce the immune system or contribute to horizontal gene transfer leading several adverse effects [71]. Though, Lactobacillus strains hold promise to show therapeutic potential in various diseases, their safety evaluation needs careful consideration and possess an important challenge.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that probiotic Lactobacillus strains obtained from natural sources as well as supplements holds both challenges and possibilities. The recent advancement in this field with the addition of high throughput approaches has greatly improved our understanding of Lactobacillus mediated beneficial effects and their further development as therapeutics. The probiotics from natural sources as well as from supplemented strains shows potential in many aspects. Overcoming production challenges, ensuring safety, exploring targeted applications, and advancing personalized and combination therapies are key areas of focus. Continued research, innovation, and evidence-based practice will pave the way for harnessing the full potential of natural Lactobacillus as probiotics.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC, Sanders ME. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shokryazdan P, Faseleh Jahromi M, Liang JB, Ho YW. Probiotics: from isolation to application. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36:666–676. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2017.1337529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Homayouni Rad A, Pourjafar H, Mirzakhani E. A comprehensive review of the application of probiotics and postbiotics in oral health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1120995. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1120995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khurshid M, Aslam B, Nisar MA, Akbar R, Rahman H, Khan AA, Rasool MH. Bacterial munch for infants: potential pediatric therapeutic interventions of probiotics. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:1881–1895. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mangiola F, Ianiro G, Franceschi F, Fagiuoli S, Gasbarrini G, Gasbarrini A. Gut microbiota in autism and mood disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:361–368. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zheng N, Guo R, Wang J, Zhou W, Ling Z. Contribution of lactobacillus iners to vaginal health and diseases: a systematic review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:792787. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.792787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alonzo Martinez MC, Cazorla E, Canovas E, Martinez-Blanch JF, Chenoll E, Climent E, Navarro-Lopez V. Study of the vaginal microbiota in healthy women of reproductive age. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1069. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Petrova MI, Lievens E, Malik S, Imholz N, Lebeer S. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front Physiol. 2015;6:81. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1899–1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buchta V. Vaginal microbiome. Ceska Gynekol. 2018;83:371–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moreno I, Garcia-Grau I, Bau D, Perez-Villaroya D, Gonzalez-Monfort M, Vilella F, Romero R, Simon C. The first glimpse of the endometrial microbiota in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee CY, Dillard LR, Papin JA, Arnold KB. New perspectives into the vaginal microbiome with systems biology. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hickey RJ, Zhou X, Pierson JD, Ravel J, Forney LJ. Understanding vaginal microbiome complexity from an ecological perspective. Transl Res. 2012;160:267–282. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, Sakamoto J, Schutte UM, Zhong X, Koenig SS, Fu L, Ma ZS, Zhou X, Abdo Z, Forney LJ, Ravel J. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:132ra152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sabo MC, Balkus JE, Richardson BA, Srinivasan S, Kimani J, Anzala O, Schwebke J, Feidler TL, Fredricks DN, McClelland RS. Association between vaginal washing and vaginal bacterial concentrations. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, Sheth NU, Girerd PH, Edwards DJ, Strauss JF The Vaginal Microbiome Consortium. Jefferson KK, Buck GA. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology (Reading) 2014;160:2272–2282. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.081034-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roachford OSE, Alleyne AT, Nelson KE. Insights into the vaginal microbiome in a diverse group of women of African, Asian and European ancestries. PeerJ. 2022;10:e14449. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garg KB, Ganguli I, Das R, Talwar GP. Spectrum of Lactobacillus species present in healthy vagina of Indian women. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129:652–657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Madhivanan P, Alleyn HN, Raphael E, Krupp K, Ravi K, Nebhrajani R, Arun A, Reingold AL, Riley LW, Klausner JD. Identification of culturable vaginal Lactobacillus species among reproductive age women in Mysore, India. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64:636–641. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Das Purkayastha S, Bhattacharya MK, Prasad HK, Upadhyaya H, Lala SD, Pal K, Das M, Sharma GD, Bhattacharjee MJ. Contrasting diversity of vaginal lactobacilli among the females of Northeast India. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:198. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1568-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mane A, Khan I, Thakar M. Characterisation of colonisation properties of vaginal lactobacilli from healthy Indian women: Implications for identification of potential probiotic candidates. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2020;38:440–443. doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_20_108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mane A, Angadi M, Vidhate P, Bembalkar S, Khan I, Bichare S, Ghate M, Thakar M. Characterization of vaginal lactobacilli from HIV-negative and HIV-positive Indian women and their association with genital HIV-1 shedding. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66:1471–1475. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mehta O, Ghosh TS, Kothidar A, Gowtham MR, Mitra R, Kshetrapal P, Wadhwa N, Thiruvengadam R GARBH-Ini study group. Nair GB, Bhatnagar S, Das B. Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species. Microb Ecol. 2020;80:487–499. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01501-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vasundhara D, Raju VN, Hemalatha R, Nagpal R, Kumar M. Vaginal & gut microbiota diversity in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis & effect of oral probiotics: an exploratory study. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153:492–502. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_350_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Happel AU, Kullin B, Gamieldien H, Wentzel N, Zauchenberger CZ, Jaspan HB, Dabee S, Barnabas SL, Jaumdally SZ, Dietrich J, Gray G, Bekker LG, Froissart R, Passmore JS. Exploring potential of vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women for enhancing treatment for bacterial vaginosis. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008559. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lokken EM, Manguro GO, Abdallah A, Ngacha C, Shafi J, Kiarie J, Jaoko W, Srinivasan S, Fiedler TL, Munch MM, Fredricks DN, McClelland RS, Balkus JE. Association between vaginal washing and detection of Lactobacillus by culture and quantitative PCR in HIV-seronegative Kenyan women: a cross-sectional analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95:455–461. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang KD, Xu DJ, Wang BY, Yan DH, Lv Z, Su JR. Inhibitory effect of vaginal lactobacillus supernatants on cervical cancer cells. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10:236–242. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9339-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mousavi E, Makvandi M, Teimoori A, Ataei A, Ghafari S, Samarbaf-Zadeh A. Antiviral effects of Lactobacillus crispatus against HSV-2 in mammalian cell lines. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81:262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boris S, Suarez JE, Vazquez F, Barbes C. Adherence of human vaginal lactobacilli to vaginal epithelial cells and interaction with uropathogens. Infect Immun. 1998;66:1985–1989. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.5.1985-1989.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Takada K, Komine-Aizawa S, Kuramochi T, Ito S, Trinh QD, Pham NTK, Sasano M, Hayakawa S. Lactobacillus crispatus accelerates re-epithelialization in vaginal epithelial cell line MS74. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80:e13027. doi: 10.1111/aji.13027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Doerflinger SY, Throop AL, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Bacteria in the vaginal microbiome alter the innate immune response and barrier properties of the human vaginal epithelia in a species-specific manner. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1989–1999. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Witkin SS, Mendes-Soares H, Linhares IM, Jayaram A, Ledger WJ, Forney LJ. Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. mBio. 2013;4:e00460-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00460-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leizer J, Nasioudis D, Forney LJ, Schneider GM, Gliniewicz K, Boester A, Witkin SS. Properties of epithelial cells and vaginal secretions in pregnant women when lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners dominate the vaginal microbiome. Reprod Sci. 2018;25:854–860. doi: 10.1177/1933719117698583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Witkin SS, Moron AF, Linhares IM, Forney LJ. Influence of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Gardnerella vaginalis on bacterial vaginal composition in pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304:395–400. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-05978-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gupta V, Garg R. Probiotics. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009;27:202–209. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.53201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wilkins T, Sequoia J. Probiotics for gastrointestinal conditions: a summary of the evidence. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96:170–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nagaoka S. Yogurt production. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1887:45–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8907-2_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Touret T, Oliveira M, Semedo-Lemsaddek T. Putative probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from sauerkraut fermentations. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0203501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kwak SH, Cho YM, Noh GM, Om AS. Cancer preventive potential of kimchi lactic acid bacteria (Weissella cibaria, Lactobacillus plantarum) J Cancer Prev. 2014;19:253–258. doi: 10.15430/JCP.2014.19.4.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng Y, Fei Y, Yang Y, Jin Z, Yu B, Li L. A potential flavor culture: Lactobacillus harbinensis M1 improves the organoleptic quality of fermented soymilk by high production of 2,3-butanedione and acetoin. Food Microbiol. 2020;91:103540. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mendonca GMN, Oliveira EMD, Rios AO, Pagno CH, Cavallini DCU. Vegan ice cream made from soy extract, soy Kefir and Jaboticaba peel: antioxidant capacity and sensory profile. Foods. 2022;11:3148. doi: 10.3390/foods11193148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Han S, Lu Y, Xie J, Fei Y, Zheng G, Wang Z, Liu J, Lv L, Ling Z, Berglund B, Yao M, Li L. Probiotic gastrointestinal transit and colonization after oral administration: a long journey. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:609722. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.609722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Markowiak P, Slizewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9:1021. doi: 10.3390/nu9091021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pino A, Bartolo E, Caggia C, Cianci A, Randazzo CL. Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40304-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fontana L, Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Diaz J, Munoz-Quezada S, Gil A. Sources, isolation, characterisation and evaluation of probiotics. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(Suppl 2):S35–50. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512004011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sanders ME, Akkermans LM, Haller D, Hammerman C, Heimbach J, Hormannsperger G, Huys G, Levy DD, Lutgendorff F, Mack D, Phothirath P, Solano-Aguilar G, Vaughan E. Safety assessment of probiotics for human use. Gut Microbes. 2010;1:164–185. doi: 10.4161/gmic.1.3.12127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kiousi DE, Rathosi M, Tsifintaris M, Chondrou P, Galanis A. Pro-biomics: omics technologies to unravel the role of probiotics in health and disease. Adv Nutr. 2021;12:1802–1820. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Teusink B, Molenaar D. Systems biology of lactic acid bacteria: for food and thought. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2017;6:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Parolin C, Marangoni A, Laghi L, Foschi C, Nahui Palomino RA, Calonghi N, Cevenini R, Vitali B. Isolation of vaginal Lactobacilli and characterization of anti-candida activity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Barkhidarian B, Roldos L, Iskandar MM, Saedisomeolia A, Kubow S. Probiotic supplementation and micronutrient status in healthy subjects: a systematic review of clinical trials. Nutrients. 2021;13:3001. doi: 10.3390/nu13093001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee YK, Puong KY. Competition for adhesion between probiotics and human gastrointestinal pathogens in the presence of carbohydrate. Br J Nutr. 2002;88(Suppl 1):S101–108. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Antonio MA, Meyn LA, Murray PJ, Busse B, Hillier SL. Vaginal colonization by probiotic Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05 is decreased by sexual activity and endogenous Lactobacilli. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1506–1513. doi: 10.1086/598686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu Y, Wang J, Wu C. Modulation of gut microbiota and immune system by probiotics, pre-biotics, and post-biotics. Front Nutr. 2022;8:634897. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.634897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Monteagudo-Mera A, Rastall RA, Gibson GR, Charalampopoulos D, Chatzifragkou A. Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:6463–6472. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09978-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu H, Cui SW, Chen M, Li Y, Liang R, Xu F, Zhong F. Protective approaches and mechanisms of microencapsulation to the survival of probiotic bacteria during processing, storage and gastrointestinal digestion: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:2863–2878. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1377684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Marco ML, Heeney D, Binda S, Cifelli CJ, Cotter PD, Foligne B, Ganzle M, Kort R, Pasin G, Pihlanto A, Smid EJ, Hutkins R. Health benefits of fermented foods: microbiota and beyond. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;44:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee Y, Ji YR, Lee S, Choi MJ, Cho Y. Microencapsulation of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus KBL409 by extrusion technology to enhance survival under simulated intestinal and freeze-drying conditions. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;29:721–730. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1903.03018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun W, Nguyen Q, Sipiczki G, Ziane S, Hristovski K, Friedrich L, Visy A, Hitka G, Gere A, Bujna E. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v strain with whey proteins by lyophilization and its application in production of probiotic apple juices. Applied Sciences. 2022;13:318. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhao M, Huang X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Gänzle M, Yang N, Nishinari K, Fang Y. Probiotic encapsulation in water-in-water emulsion via heteroprotein complex coacervation of type-A gelatin/sodium caseinate. Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;105:105790. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bonaccorso A, Russo N, Romeo A, Carbone C, Grimaudo MA, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Randazzo C, Musumeci T, Caggia C. Coating Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG in alginate systems: an emerging strategy towards improved viability in orange juice. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22:123. doi: 10.1208/s12249-021-01996-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Motalebi Moghanjougi Z, Rezazadeh Bari M, Alizadeh Khaledabad M, Amiri S, Almasi H. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis BB-12 in pectin and sodium alginate: a comparative study on viability, stability, and structure. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9:5103–5111. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Solanki HK, Shah DA. Formulation optimization and evaluation of probiotic Lactobacillus sporogenes-loaded sodium alginate with carboxymethyl cellulose mucoadhesive beads using design expert software. Journal of Food Processing. 2016;2016:6041671. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Abruzzo A, Vitali B, Lombardi F, Guerrini L, Cinque B, Parolin C, Bigucci F, Cerchiara T, Arbizzani C, Gallucci MC, Luppi B. Mucoadhesive buccal films for local delivery of Lactobacillus brevis. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:241. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12030241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yefet E, Colodner R, Strauss M, Gam Ze Letova Y, Nachum Z. A randomized controlled open label crossover trial to study vaginal colonization of orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 and Rhamnosus GR-1 in pregnant women at high risk for preterm labor. Nutrients. 2020;12:1141. doi: 10.3390/nu12041141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cribby S, Taylor M, Reid G. Vaginal microbiota and the use of probiotics. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008;2008:256490. doi: 10.1155/2008/256490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Figueroa-Gonzalez I, Quijano G, Ramirez G, Cruz-Guerrero A. Probiotics and prebiotics--perspectives and challenges. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91:1341–1348. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Foligne B, Daniel C, Pot B. Probiotics from research to market: the possibilities, risks and challenges. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16:284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shoureshi PS, Niino C, Eilber KS. Can vaginal lactobacillus suppositories help reduce urinary tract infections? Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34:2713–2718. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05568-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kullar R, Goldstein EJC, Johnson S, McFarland LV. Lactobacillus bacteremia and probiotics: a review. Microorganisms. 2023;11:896. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zawistowska-Rojek A, Tyski S. Are probiotic really safe for humans? Pol J Microbiol. 2018;67:251–258. doi: 10.21307/pjm-2018-044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]