Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;52(5):1255–1269. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03450-y

Table 3.

Quantification of the bone parameters

Models Averaging Bone parameters
BV/TV Tb.Th Tb.Sp Tb.N
Interpolation 0.64 0.34 0.59 − 0.4
Conventional segmentation 0.67 0.42 0.50 − 0.63
Baseline 2D No 0.736 ± 0.006 0.404 ± 0.008 0.694 ± 0.004 − 0.514 ± 0.007
Yes 0.665 ± 0.003 0.336 ± 0.003 0.608 ± 0.006 − 0.458 ± 0.0001
Structure 2D No 0.817 ± 0.005 0.53 ± 0.02 0.756 ± 0.009 − 0.489 ± 0.007
Yes 0.731 ± 0.007 0.436 ± 0.006 0.613 ± 0.010 − 0.41 ± 0.02
Visual 2D No 0.758 ± 0.012 0.453 ± 0.011 0.70 ± 0.02 − 0.57 ± 0.02
Yes 0.674 ± 0.004 0.340 ± 0.009 0.609 ± 0.011 − 0.5 ± 0.02
Baseline 3D 0.654 ± 0.010 0.33 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.011 − 0.34 ± 0.03

The highest correlation on each parameter is bolded

Predictions from each model were binarized and the bone parameters were compared to the micro-computed tomography (µCT) ground truth. The values indicate Pearson correlations and the respective 95% confidence intervals

BV/TV = bone volume fraction, Tb.Th = trabecular thickness, Tb.Sp = trabecular separation, Tb.N = trabecular number