Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;274(3):723–737. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01672-0

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for the identified subgroups

Variables Entire sample of patients with values for M*
(n = 50)
Subgroup likely to benefit more from ESC/CM than from CBASP
(n = 28)
Subgroup likely to benefit more from CBASP than from ESC/CM
(n = 22)
Difference between subgroups with
95% CI and p-value
Baseline variables which were included in the compilation of M*
 Female gender (%) 50.0 60.7 36.4 24.4 (−2.7; 51.4); p = 0.2
 Age in years (mean (SD)) 42.9 (1.08) 40.2 (10.8) 46.4 (9.9) −6.2 (−12.2; −0.2); p = 0.04
 Early illness onset (%) 58.0 42.9 77.3 −34.4 (−59.8; −9.1); p = 0.02
 Number of previous suicide attempts (mean (SD)) 0.3 (0.7) 0.50 (0.8) 0.1 (0.4) 0.4 (0.03; 0.8); p = 0.03
 Childhood trauma (%)a 70.0 82.1 54.5 27.6 (2.4; 52.8); p = 0.06
 Number of adverse life events (mean (SD)) 1.8 (1.1) 2.1 (1.2) 1.4 (0.8) 0.7 (0.1; 1.4); p = 0.02
 Proportion of patients with following frequency of previous treatments with AD (%)
  n = 0 44.0 46.4 40.9

Difference in chances of having ≥ 1 previous treatment with AD:

−5.5 (−33.1; 22.1); p = 0.8

  n = 1 20.0 25.0 13.6
  n = 2 8.0 7.1 9.1
  n = 3 18.0 17.9 18.2
  n = 4 4.0 3.6 4.6
  n   ≥ 5 6.0 0.0 13.6
Further variables which were not included in the compilation of M*
 MADRS baseline score (mean (SD)) 26.6 (8.6) 28.4 (8.1) 24.4 (8.8) 4.1 (−0.8; 8.9); p = 0.10
 Diagnosis of ≥ 1 comorbid Axis-I disorder (%)b 48.0 57.1 36.4 20.8 (−6.4; 48.0); p = 0.2
 Diagnosis of ≥ 1 comorbid Axis-II disorder (%)c 38.0 39.3 36.4 2.9 (−24.1; 30.0); p = 1.00
 History of ≥ 1 suicide attempt (%) 22.0 35.7 4.5 31.2 (11.4; 50.9); p = 0.01
 Emotional abuse (%)d 38.0 39.3 36.4 2.9 (−24.1; 30.0); p = 1.00
 Physical abuse (%)d 12.0 14.3 9.1 5.2 (−12.5; 22.9); p = 0.7
 Sexual abuse (%)d 10.0 14.3 4.5 9.7 (−5.9; 25.3); p = 0.4
 Emotional neglect (%)d 56.0 57.1 54.5 2.6 (−25.1; 30.0); p = 1.00
 Physical neglect (%)d 34.0 35.7 31.8 3.9 (−22.4; 30.2); p = 1.00
 Proportion of patients with following frequency of previous psychotherapeutic treatments (%)
  n = 0 30.0 32.1 27.3

Difference in chances of having ≥ 1 previous psychotherapy:

−4.9 (−30.3; 20.5); p = 0.8

  n = 1 24.0 28.6 18.2
  n = 2 20.0 17.9 22.7
  n = 3 10.0 10.7 9.1
  n = 4 6.0 7.1 4.6
  n ≥ 5 10.0 3.6 18.2
 Response at week eight (%) 20.0 25.0 13.6 11.4 (−10.2; 32.9); p = 0.5
 Remission at week eight (%) 12.0 14.3 9.1 5.2 (−12.5; 22.9); p = 0.7

Note: For nominal and ordinal variables, p-values and 95% CIs from the Fisher’s exact tests are reported. For metric variables, p-values and 95% CIs from independent sample t-tests are reported

aPresence indicates a clinical severity of at least moderate-to-severe on at least one dimension of the CTQ

bPrevalences (%) for comorbid Axis-I disorders were as follows: Alcohol abuse: 10.0; Substance abuse: 4.0; Panic disorder: 4.0; Panic disorder with agoraphobia: 8.0; Social phobia: 30.0 (46.7 CBASP benefit); Specific phobia: 10.0; Generalized anxiety disorder: 2.0; Bulimia nervosa: 2.0; Binge eating disorder: 4.0; all other Axis-I disorders: 0.0

cPrevalences (%) for comorbid Axis-II disorders were as follows: Self-insecure personality disorder: 26.0 (38.5 CBASP benefit); Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder: 12.0; Depressive personality disorder: 4.0; Paranoid personality disorder: 4.0; all other Axis-II disorders: 0.0

dPresence indicates a clinical severity of at least moderate-to-severe on the respective dimension of the CTQ

AbbreviationsAD, antidepressants; CBASP, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy; CI, confidence interval; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [47]; ESC/CM, escitalopram plus clinical management; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [48]; SD, standard deviation