Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;14:7928. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58744-x

Table 4.

Presents a comparative analysis between the findings of this study and those of prior research endeavors pertaining to photocatalysis.

Film materials Dye type and concentration Technique type Degradation (%) Time (min) Irradiation Source References
CuO (0.1 g/ml) Methylene blue, 0.0022 g/l Dip-coating (glass Substrate) 82 180 Visible light Current study
CuO NWs Methylene blue, 0.0012 g/l Porous CuO nanowire (NW) matrix 34 180 Visible light 62
CuO@TiO2-300 Methylene blue, 0.0012 g/l ALD process was performed on CuO NW 42 180 Visible light 62
CuO/ZnO (Simple A) Methylene blue, 0.005 g/l Spin-coating with Glass Substrate 44 120 Xe lamp of 150 W 63
Cu2O Methylene blue, 0.005 g/l Spray pyrolysis growth technique 60 120 solar simulator (Dayan) 100 mW/cm2 64
CuO Methylene blue, 0.003 g/l Spraying (glass Substrate) 74 360 Visible light 65
CuO-ZnO (1:3) Methylene blue, 0.003 g/l Spraying (glass Substrate) 85 360 Visible light 65
Cu:Co (70:30) Methylene blue, 0.003 g/l Dip-coating (glass Substrate) 78 240 Visible light 7
CuO Rhodamine-b, 0.01 g/l Sputtering and thermal annealing (glass Substrate) 56 120 250W Xenon lamp 66