Table 10.
Genotypic response after the third drought and salt application.
Genotype | NL | NT | PH | RV | AG | TI | CR | FR | RL | SA | RA | RDW | RS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azeghar | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨D | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨S | ∨S | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨D | ∨DS | ∨S |
Cham1 | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨S | ∨S | ∨DS | ∨S | ∨DS | no | ∨DS | ∨S |
J. Khetifa | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∨S | ∨DS | ∨DS | no | no | ∨DS | ∨S | ∨DS | no | ∨DS | ∧D∨S |
Sebatel | ∨DS | ∨DS | no | ∨DS | ∨DS | no | no | no | no | ∨D | no | ∨DS | no |
(no), no significant differences between stress and control conditions; (∧), significantly increased; (∨), significantly decreased; (D), under drought; (S), under salt; (DS), under drought and salt; NL, number of leaves; NT, number of tillers; PH, plant height; RV, root volume; AG, root average diameter; TI, number of tips; CR, number of crossings; FR, number of forks; RL, total root length; SA, root surface area; RA, root angle; RDW, root dry weight; RS, root/shoot ratio.