Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 22;15:1362917. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1362917

Table 9.

Genotypic response after the second drought and salt application.

Genotype NL NT PH RV AG TI CR FR RL SA RA
Azeghar ∧DS no ∧S ∧S ∨D ∧D ∧D ∧DS no ∧S no
Cham1 no ∨DS ∨DS ∧D ∨DS ∧DS ∧DS ∧D ∧DS ∧D no
J. Khetifa ∧DS no ∨DS ∧DS no ∧DS ∧D ∧DS ∧DS ∧DS ∧D
Sebatel no no no no no no no no no no DS

(no), no significant differences between stress and control conditions; (∧), significantly increased; (∨), significantly decreased; (D), under drought; (S), under salt; (DS), under drought and salt; NL, number of leaves; NT, number of tillers; PH, plant height; RV, root volume; AG, root average diameter; TI, number of tips; CR, number of crossings; FR, number of forks; RL, total root length; SA, root surface area; RA, root angle.