Table 9.
Genotypic response after the second drought and salt application.
Genotype | NL | NT | PH | RV | AG | TI | CR | FR | RL | SA | RA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azeghar | ∧DS | no | ∧S | ∧S | ∨D | ∧D | ∧D | ∧DS | no | ∧S | no |
Cham1 | no | ∨DS | ∨DS | ∧D | ∨DS | ∧DS | ∧DS | ∧D | ∧DS | ∧D | no |
J. Khetifa | ∧DS | no | ∨DS | ∧DS | no | ∧DS | ∧D | ∧DS | ∧DS | ∧DS | ∧D |
Sebatel | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | ∧DS |
(no), no significant differences between stress and control conditions; (∧), significantly increased; (∨), significantly decreased; (D), under drought; (S), under salt; (DS), under drought and salt; NL, number of leaves; NT, number of tillers; PH, plant height; RV, root volume; AG, root average diameter; TI, number of tips; CR, number of crossings; FR, number of forks; RL, total root length; SA, root surface area; RA, root angle.