Table 3.
Discriminations of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models.
| AUC | IDI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic | 95% CI | p value | PTP | Statisticb | p value | ||
| Positivea | Negative | ||||||
| RF-CL model | 0.782 | 0.750–0.819 | 0.0016 | 47% | 21% | 12% | <0.0001 |
| CACS-CL model | 0.856 | 0.823–0.892 | 54% | 16% | |||
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; RF-CL, risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood; CACS-CL, coronary artery calcium score-weighted clinical likelihood; CI, confidence interval; CAD, coronary artery disease.
A positive patient was defined as a patient who had obstructive CAD.
Compared with the RF-CL model, the IDI of the CACS-CL model = [P(CACS-CL | Positive) − P(RF-CL | Positive)] − [ P(CACS-CL | Negative) − P(RF-CL | Negative)].