Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 22;11:1368743. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1368743

Table 3.

Discriminations of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models.

AUC IDI
Statistic 95% CI p value PTP Statisticb p value
Positivea Negative
RF-CL model 0.782 0.750–0.819 0.0016 47% 21% 12% <0.0001
CACS-CL model 0.856 0.823–0.892 54% 16%

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; RF-CL, risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood; CACS-CL, coronary artery calcium score-weighted clinical likelihood; CI, confidence interval; CAD, coronary artery disease.

a

A positive patient was defined as a patient who had obstructive CAD.

b

Compared with the RF-CL model, the IDI of the CACS-CL model = [P(CACS-CL | Positive) − P(RF-CL | Positive)] − [ P(CACS-CL | Negative) − P(RF-CL | Negative)].