Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 22;11:1368743. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1368743

Table 4.

Reclassification table comparing the RF-CL and CACS-CL models.

Risk groups by CACS-CL model Reclassificationa NRIb p
Low High Total Up Down
Risk groups by RF-CL model
Negative patients 1.29% 25.39% 34.32% <0.0001
 Low 455 9 464
 High 177 56 233
Total 632 65 697
Positive patientsc 11.13% 0.91%
 Low 57 61 118
 High 5 425 438
Total 62 486 548

RF-CL, risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood; CACS-CL, coronary artery calcium score-weighted clinical likelihood; CAD, coronary artery disease.

a

The classification of patients by the CACS-CL model was compared with that by the RF-CL model.

b

NRI = [P(Up | Positive) − P(Down | Positive)] − [ P(Up | Negative) − P(Down | Negative)].

c

A positive patient was defined as a patient who had obstructive CAD.