Table 5.
Summary of cases that showed positive TCD embolic signals after PED deployment
| Pt | Age | Gender | Aneurysm size | #PED | Coiling | PRU | % inhibition | Initial |
Followup |
Final |
Outcome | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mES/h | Mgmt | mES/h | Mgmt | mES /h | Mgmt | |||||||||
| 1 | 71 | 1 | 20 | 1 | N | 74 | 18.7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | intact |
| 2 | 72 | 2 | 17 | 2 | Y | 199 | 34.1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 3 | 47 | 1 | 3.5 | 1 | N | 145 | 39.1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 4 | 51 | 1 | 11 | 1 | Y | 119 | 60.2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 5 | 42 | 1 | 8 | 1 | N | 172 | 33.3 | 6 | 1 | 297 | 4 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 6 | 63 | 2 | 8 | 1 | Y | 199 | 27.1 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 7 | 42 | 2 | 8 | 1 | N | 152 | 8.4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 8 | 44 | 1 | 3.5 | 1 | N | 78 | 70.1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 9 | 70 | 2 | 14 | 1 | N | 217 | 20.8 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 10 | 30 | 2 | 25 | 1 | Y | 130 | 30.1 | 18 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 18 | 5 | intact |
| 11 | 49 | 1 | 7.2 | 1 | N | 139 | 46.1 | 42 | 2 | 51 | 2 | 0 | 1 | intact |
| 12 | 48 | 1 | 6.5 | 1 | N | 105 | 70.8 | 303 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | intact |
Mgmt: 1=Repeat TCD only, 2=Heparin, 3=Ticagelor, 4=Reload ASA/Piavix, 5=Multiple Meds
TCD, transcranial Doppler; PED, pipeline embolization device; PRU, P2Y12 reaction units