Table 3. Comparison of Library Retention Indices to Those Calculated for Selected Derivatives.
| Lp. | Derivative | library RI | calculated RI | Difference: RI lib – RI cal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bis(2-heptyl) (Figure 10) | 1828 | 1850 | –22 |
| 2 | mono 2-heptyl (Figure 10) | 1529 | 1520 | 9 |
| 3 | bis(2-octyl) (Figure 10) | 2008 | 2024 | –16 |
| 4 | mono 2-octyl (Figure 10) | 1618 | 1603 | 15 |
| 5 | bis(4-methyl-1-pentyl) (Figure 14) | 1768 | 1778 | –10 |
| 6 | mono 4-methyl-1-pentyl (Figure 14) | 1483 | 1494 | –11 |