Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;19:174. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02754-3

Table 4.

Postoperative gradients in subgroup of patients with different prosthesis sizes and type, for different suture technique

N 19 + 21 p-value N 23 p-value N > 23 p-value
Peak gradient mmHg (sd)
Magna IPT 43 24.0 (11.4) 0.02 117 21.3 (8.8) 0.001 165 18.3 (7.5) 0.01
CST 36 18.3 (10.0) 142 18.4 (5.9) 364 16.1 (6.4)
Trifecta IPT 37 17.7 (6.7) 0.003 98 16.2 (7.3) 0.001 65 13.8 (7.1) 0.45
CST 38 13.7 (6.5) 89 12.4 (5.0) 107 13.1 (5.5)
Mean gradient mmHg (sd)
Magna IPT 43 13.2 (6.5) 0.01 117 11.5 (5.0) 0.001 165 10.0 (4.3) 0.001
CST 36 9.8 (4.8) 142 9.6 (3.2) 364 8.6 (3.7)
Trifecta IPT 37 9.3 (3.6) 0.003 98 8.2 (4.0) 0.001 65 7.0 (4.3) 0.67
CST 38 7.1 (3.6) 89 6.4 (2.9) 107 6.8 (3.1)

CST: Continues suture technique; IPT: Interrupted pledgeted technique, N: Number of patients available for analysis; The numbers (19, 21, 23) indicate the size of prosthesis as indicated by the companies