Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;95(1135):20210263. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210263

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of forest plot for pooled sensitivity and specificity for 18F-FDG PET (A) and conventional imaging (B) for the characterisation of cardiac masses. 18F-FDG PET, 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.