Table 3.
A meta-regression analysis was conducted to examine the factors contributing to the heterogeneity observed between studies.
| Heterogeneity sources | Coefficient | Standard error | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level of good AMR knowledge | |||
| Publication year | −0.0130042 | 0.103559 | 0.901 |
| Sample size | −0.0002539 | 0.0004243 | 0.553 |
| Level of positive attitude toward AMR | |||
| Publication year | −0.1039918 | 0.1503811 | 0.495 |
| Sample size | −0.0005252 | 0.0008723 | 0.552 |
| Good level of AMR practices | |||
| Publication year | −0.0177752 | 0.1395804 | 0.900 |
| Sample size | −0.0000913 | 0.0004699 | 0.848 |