Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;95(1137):20220382. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220382

Table 4.

Locations of regional nodes outside RTOG, ESTRO, RADCOMP and RUIJIN guidelines

ALN-I Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 75/109 (68.8%) 34/109 (31.2%) 1/109 (0.9%) a1 0/109 (0%) a2 34/109 (31.2%) a3
ESTRO guideline 65/109 (59.6%) 44/109 (40.4%) 1/109 (0.9%) a1 16/109 (14.7%) b2 34/109 (31.2%) a3
RADCOMP guideline 75/109 (68.8%) 34/109 (31.2%) 1/109 (0.9%) a1 0/109 (0%) a2 34/109 (31.2%) a3
RUIJIN guideline 75/109 (68.8%) 34/109 (31.2%) 1/109 (0.9%) a1 0/109 (0%) a2 34/109 (31.2%) a3
ALN-II Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 14/46 (30.4%) 32/46 (70.0%) 4/46 (8.7%) a4 31/46 (67.4%) a5
ESTRO guideline 42/46 (91.3%) 4/46 (8.7%) 4/46 (8.7%) a4 0/46 (0%) b5
RADCOMP guideline 46/46 (100%) 0/46 (0%) 0/46 (0%) a4 0/46 (0%) b5
RUIJIN guideline 42/46 (91.3%) 4/46 (8.7%) 4/46 (8.7%) a4 0/46 (0%) b5
ALN-III Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 32/36 (88.9%) 4/36 (11.1%) 1/36 (2.8%) a6 3/36 (8.3%) a7
ESTRO guideline 27/36 (75.0%) 9/46 (25.0%) 7/36 (19.4%) a6 2/36 (5.6%) a7
RADCOMP guideline 35/36 (97.2%) 1/36 (2.8%) 1/36 (2.8%) a6 0/36 (0%) a7
RUIJIN guideline 32/36 (88.9%) 4/36 (11.1%) 1/36 (2.8%) a6 3/36 (8.3%) a7
RN Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 17/17 (100%) 0/17 (0%)
ESTRO guideline 17/17 (100%) 0/17 (0%)
RADCOMP guideline 17/17 (100%) 0/17 (0%)
RUIJIN guideline 17/17 (100%) 0/17 (0%)
SC-M Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 59/68 (88.7%) 9/68 (13.3%) 1/68 (1.5%) a8 2/68 (2.9%) a9 6/68 (8.8%) a10 0/68 (0%) a11
ESTRO guideline 23/68 (33.8%) 45/68 (66.2%) 44/68 (64.7%) b8 2/68 (2.9%) a9 1/68 (1.5%) a10 3/68 (4.4%) a11
RADCOMP guideline 66/68 (97.1%) 2/68 (2.9%) 1/68 (1.5%) a8 0/68 (0%) a9 1/68 (1.5%) a10 0/68 (0%) a11
RUIJIN guideline 64/68 (94.1%) 4/68 (5.9%) 1/68 (1.5%) a8 2/68 (2.9%) a9 1/68 (1.5%) a10 0/68 (0%) a11
SC-L Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 0/36 (0%) 36/36 (100%) not contoured in RTOG guideline
ESTRO guideline 0/36 (0%) 36/36 (100%) not contoured in ESTRO guideline
RADCOMP guideline 34/36 (94.4%) 2/36 (5.6%) 2/36 (5.6%) a12 0/36 (0%) a13 0/36 (0%) a14
RUIJIN guideline 30/36 (83.3%) 6/36 (16.7%) 2/36 (5.6%) a12 2/36 (5.6%) a13 2/36 (5.6%) a14
IMN Coverage of substructures Directions of substructures outside the CTVs
Inside
n (%)
Outside
n (%)
Cranial
n (%)
Caudal
n (%)
Anterior
n (%)
Posterior
n (%)
Lateral
n (%)
Meidal
n (%)
RTOG guideline 8/36 (22.2%) 28/36 (77.8%) 1/36 (2.8%) a15 5/36 (13.9%) a16 11/36 (30.6%) a17 13/36 (36.1%) a18
ESTRO guideline 28/36 (77.8%) 8/36 (22.2%) 1/36 (2.8%) a15 0/36 (0%) a16 4/36 (11.1%)a17,b17 4/36 (11.1%)a18,b18
RADCOMP guideline 33/36 (91.7%) 3/36 (8.3%) 1/36 (2.8%) a15 0/36 (0%) a16 2/36 (5.6%) b17 0/36 (0%) b18
RUIJIN guideline 31/36 (86.1%) 5/36 (13.9%) 1/36 (2.8%) a15 0/36 (0%) a16 2/36 (5.6%) b17 2/36 (5.6%) b18

ALN-I, axillary lymph node level I; ALN-II, axillary lymph node level II; ALN-III, axillary lymph node level III; ESTRO, European Society for Radiation Therapy and Oncology; IMN, internal mammary nodes; RADCOMP, Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness; RN, Rotter’s nodes; RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; SC-L, lateral supraclavicular; SC-M, medial supraclavicular.

Indications: A Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold of p=0.008 (0.05/6) was used to compare the coverage between different guidelines. There was a statistically significant difference in proportions between groups with different marks (“a” vs “b”), while no significant difference was found between groups with the same mark (“a” vs “a”).