Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 3;13(4):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.4.7

Table 2.

Comparison of Mean Difference (95% LoA) of Central 0° and Peripheral Refractive Error Values Between Two Peripheral Retinoscopy Techniques Open-field Autorefractor, Performed by Junior Examiners 1 and 2

Mean Difference (95% LoA)
Spherical Equivalent (D) Sphere (D) Cylinder (D)
Eccentricity Condition Junior Examiner 1 Junior Examiner 2 Junior Examiner 1 Junior Examiner 2 Junior Examiner 1 Junior Examiner 2
Central 0° OFAR vs. CR 0.09 −0.10 0.18* 0.05 −0.18 −0.30*
(−0.49 to +0.67) (−1.02 to +0.82) (−0.41 to +0.77) (−0.83 to +0.94) (−0.86 to +0.50) (−1.00 to +0.39)
Temporal 22° OFAR vs. P−ARC −0.10 −0.50 ± 0.21* 0.00 −0.29 −0.20 −0.43*
(−1.46 to +1.26) (−2.01 to 1.22) (−1.39 to +1.39) (−1.62 to +1.04) (−1.16 to +0.77) (−2.08 to +1.22)
OFAR vs. ER −0.08 −0.33 −0.18 −0.41* 0.20 0.16
(−1.24 to +1.08) (−1.53 to +0.86) (−1.53 to +1.17) (−1.64 to +0.81) (−1.19 to +1.58) (−1.59 to +1.91)
P−ARC vs. ER 0.02 0.17 −0.18 0.13 0.39 0.59*
(−1.22 to +1.26) (−0.58 to +0.92) (−1.71 to +1.35) (−0.76 to +0.51) (0.96 to +1.75) (−0.64 to +1.81)
Nasal 22° OFAR vs. P−ARC −0.18 −0.38 −0.09 −0.16 −0.18 −0.45
(−1.55 to +1.19) (−1.92 to +1.16) (−1.60 to +1.42) (−1.66 to +1.34) (−1.78 to +1.42) (−2.21 to +1.45)
OFAR vs. ER 0.10 −0.30 ± 0.19 0.23 −0.14 −0.27 −0.32
(−0.81 to +1.01) (−1.68 to +1.07) (−0.85 to +1.31) (−1.46 to +1.17) (−1.74 to +1.20) (−2.01 to +1.37)
P−ARC vs. ER −0.28 0.08 0.32 0.02 +0.09 0.13
(−0.88 to +1.43) (−0.78 to +0.94) (−0.89 to +1.53) (−0.57 to +0.61) (−1.00 to +0.82) (−0.81 to +1.06)

CR, central retinoscopy; ER, eye rotation; OFAR, open-field autorefractor.

*

Indicates a significant difference between the two techniques. P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significance.