Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 6;23:75. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01980-6

Table 2.

Prognostic effects of different TLS characteristics on different disease types

TLS features Disease types Methodology Prognostic value Experimental Subject References
Quantity and density High TLS density iCCA mIHC Positive Patients [16]
HCC IHC Positive Patients [106]
Quantity Non-functional Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

H&E

IHC

No prognostic significance Patients [16]
Locations Intra-tumoral iCCA mIHC Positive Patients [16]

CRC

liver metastases

mIHC Positive Patients [104]
HCC

H&E

IHC

Positive patients [49]
Peritumoral iCCA mIHC Negative Patients [16]
Melanoma mIHC Positive Patients [107]
HCC

H&E

IHC

No prognostic significance patients [49]

Molecular or tissue

characteristics

CXCL13 Bladder cancer RNA seq Positive Patients [108]
Influenza A virus Flow cytometry Positive Mice [109]

IL-22,

IL-23

Crohn’s disease

H&E,

RNA seq,

Flow cytometry

Positive Mice [110]
HEV BC IHC Positive patients [49]
ND Bladder cancer IHC Positive patients [111]
CD153/CD30 Chronic kidney disease

Flow cytometry,

RNA seq

Negative Mice [82]
Endothelial notch signaling

RNA seq,

Flow cytometry,

IF

Negative Mice [112]

mIHC: Multiplex immunohistochemistry; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; H&E: Hematoxylin and eosin staining; RNA seq: RNA sequencing; IF: Immunofluorescence