Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 30;28(4):381–386. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24688

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics by glycemic variability quartiles

Quartile 1
≤19%
Quartile 2
20–27%
Quartile 3
28–34%
Quartile 4
≥35%
p
Number of patients, n (%) 56 (23) 63 (26) 59 (25) 61 (26)
Age, median (IQR) 48 (37–65)a 62 (48–74)a 59 (53–68)a 64 (56–67)a <0.001*
Gender 0.69
  Female, n (%) 28 (50) 27 (42) 23 (39) 27 (44)
  Male, n (%) 28 (50) 36 (58) 36 (61) 34 (56)
DM, n (%) 3 (5)a 9 (14)b 24 (41)ab 30 (49)ab <0.001*
Number of comorbidities <0.001*
  0, n (%) 26 (46) 21 (33) 7 (12) 10 (10)
  1–3, n (%) 28 (50) 33 (52) 45 (76) 31 (51)
  ≥3, n (%) 2 (4) 9 (15) 7 (12) 20 (39)
BMI, median (IQR) 30 (26–38) 29 (25–35) 33 (27–34) 31 (25–37) 0.69
Obesity, n (%) 28 (50) 30 (48) 29 (49) 32 (52) 0.86
SAPS-3, median (IQR) 52 (43–62)a 59 (50–68) 57 (48–67) 63 (52–70)a 0.007*
SOFA, median (IQR) 3 (3–6)a 5 (3–6) 6 (3–7)a 4 (4–8)a 0.002*
MV, n (%) 36 (64)a 55 (87)a 50 (84) 55 (90)a 0.001*

BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; IQR, interquartile range; MV, mechanical ventilation; SAPS-3, simplified acute physiology score 3; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment. *p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Continuous and ordinal variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, with Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner multiple comparisons test. Categorical variables compared using the Chi-square test. aStatistically significant difference between quartile 1 compared to other quartiles. bStatistically significant difference between quartile 2 compared to other quartiles. BMI information was not obtained for 6 patients in quartile 1, 2 patients in quartile 2, 4 patients in quartile 3, and 4 patients in quartile 4