Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 6;45(14):1255–1265. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae133

Table 3.

Predictors of arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome patients with implantable loop recorder

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Lower Upper Lower Upper
All arrhythmic events
Female sex 1.5 0.8 1.8 .51
Age > 50 years 1.8 1.2 2.8 .002 1.7 1.1 2.5 .016
ILR for symptoms 3.1 1.6 5.9 .001 2.5 1.3 4.9 .001
ILR for syncope 1.2 0.8 1.8 .46
ILR for palpitations 1.9 1.2 2.9 .003 1.4 0.9 2.3 .10
Proband status 1.6 0.9 2.7 .069
Family history of BrS 1.1 0.7 1.6 .82
Family history of SCD 1.2 0.8 1.9 .37
Shanghai score 1.0 0.9 1.2 .65
Type 1 ECG 1.0 0.7 1.5 .92
SCN5A P/LP variant 1.0 0.6 1.8 .94
Positive EP study 1.9 0.9 3.9 .085
Ventricular arrhythmic events
Female sex 0.8 0.3 2.1 .69
Age 0.1 0.9 1.0 .98
ILR for syncope 1.3 0.5 3.3 .51
ILR for symptoms 32.1 0.5 2267.4 .11
Proband status 3.8 0.9 16.4 .073
Family history of BrS 1.0 0.4 2.7 .95
Family history of SCD 0.9 0.3 2.4 .81
Shanghai score 1.3 0.9 1.7 .124
Type 1 ECG 0.8 0.3 1.9 .60
BrS pathogenic variant 1.7 0.6 4.7 .33
Positive EP study 9.0 3.4 24.2 <.001

Univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis for predictors of arrhythmias.

Abbreviations: BrS, Brugada syndrome; CI, confidence interval; EP, electrophysiological; HR, hazard ratio; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; ILR, implantable loop recorder; OR, odds ratio; PM, pacemaker; SCD, sudden cardiac death.