Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):1292–1305. doi: 10.62347/JHMS4303

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

ID Study Country Database Period Quality score Sample size (Fatty liver/Normal liver) Diagnostic method for fatty liver Age (years) Male (%) Overweight (%) Tumor location (%) Disease stage (n)
1 Besutti et al. [14] Italy local population-based Cancer Registry and from the electronic medical records of all the Local Health Authority hospitals of the province 2010 to 2016 5 202 (60/142) L/S ratio 68±14 59 NA NA Stage II (77)
Stage III (125)
2 Murono et al. [15]a Japan University of Tokyo Hospital 2004 to 2011 7 603 (63/540) L/S ratio 67±11 60.4 22.1 Colon (63.5) Stage I (160)
Rectum (36.5) Stage II (197)
Stage III (172)
3 Kondo et al. [16] Japan Keio University Hospital 2000 to 2011 7 956 (73/876) NFS Fibrotic liver 75.3±9.3 59.4 22.0 Right colon (35.3) Stage I (293)
Normal liver 64.9±11.7 Left colon (42.7) Stage II (327)
Rectum (22.0) Stage III (333)
4 Xi et al. [17] China Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University 1993 to 2002 5 243 (55/188) Ultrasound Fatty liver 64±10.8 56.4 NA NA NA
Normal liver 63±13.2
5 NCRCC database China Sencond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine 2012 to 2022 8 414 (97/317) L/S ratio 63.5±12.6 75.6 6.5 Right colon (29.7) Stage I (32)
Left colon b(70.3) Stage II (110)
Stage III (272)
a

Study with publication bias form Egger’s test;

b

Rectum was included in the left colon in this study.

L/S ratio: Liver-spleen ratio on CT scans; NFS: NAFLD fibrosis score; NCRCC: National Colorectal Cancer Cohort.